<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[z10 number Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/z10+number.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to z10 number]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="1" found="1" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Fun with IBM's Z10 numbers]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-11202-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=53632&messageID=1014155&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Fun with IBM's Z10 numbersI just don't believe the IBM numbersin terms of real-world workloads and comparing Linux-to-Linux implementations. Maybe if you are doing some kind of multi-dimensional modeling you might get some advantage from the z10, but for work-a-day web hosting?RE: Fun with IBM's Z10 numbersSo... we're looking at...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 01:58:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/linux.html"><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mainframes.html"><![CDATA[Mainframes]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/data+centers.html"><![CDATA[Data centers]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/servers.html"><![CDATA[Servers]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/storage.html"><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/z10.html"><![CDATA[Z10]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ibm+corp..html"><![CDATA[IBM Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/z10+number.html"><![CDATA[Z10 number]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">IBM</category>
		<category domain="tickers">IBM</category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
