<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[xss vulnerability Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/xss+vulnerability.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to xss vulnerability]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="2" found="2" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Mozilla tackles XSS vulnerabilities with new technology]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12691-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=65968&messageID=1238393&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Mozilla tackles XSS vulnerabilities with new technologysounds kinda like SPF, but for JavaScriptVery cool!On another note, any idea's why Firefox doesn't take advantage of the Sandbox framework provided by Vista?Is it because of Vista's market share, to ease cross platform porting, or something else?It's JavaScript not Java ScriptSome purists might...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:38:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/scripting+languages.html"><![CDATA[Scripting languages]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/web+browsers.html"><![CDATA[Web browsers]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/javascript.html"><![CDATA[JavaScript]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/xss+vulnerability.html"><![CDATA[XSS Vulnerability]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/xss.html"><![CDATA[XSS]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mozilla+corp..html"><![CDATA[Mozilla Corp.]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Google fixes critical XSS vulnerability]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12691-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=54207&messageID=1025498&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Google fixes critical XSS vulnerabilityYour first sentence says what? ntntRe: Your first sentence says what?http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_your_base_are_belong_to_us in the sense that they fixed it fast enough before someone could abuse it.Wow, really?We really need to get better at 'passing the torch' or all the old traditions will die.  You never heard...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 14:31:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/xss+vulnerability.html"><![CDATA[XSS Vulnerability]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/xss.html"><![CDATA[XSS]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/google+inc..html"><![CDATA[Google Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">GOOG</category>
		<category domain="tickers">GOOG</category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
