<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[xp sp3 performance Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/xp+sp3+performance.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to xp sp3 performance]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="1" found="1" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[XP SP3 performance gains - Nothing to write home about]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12554-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=46994&messageID=872811&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[XP SP3 performance gains - Nothing to write home aboutYou took the words right outta my mouth......er, off of my keyboard.  I half expected the same thing.  But Microsloth did themselves one better.  They can still "claim" a performance gain, but they never claimed how much. ...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 04:33:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/performance+management.html"><![CDATA[Performance management]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/nothing.html"><![CDATA[Nothing]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/xp+sp3.html"><![CDATA[XP SP3]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+xp.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows XP]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/xp+sp3+performance.html"><![CDATA[XP SP3 performance]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/performance.html"><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+vista.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows Vista]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
