<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[x64 Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/x64.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to x64]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="16" found="16" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Corsair debuts Extreme Series X32, X64, X128 SSDs]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-13615-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=66906&messageID=1265707&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Corsair debuts Extreme Series X32, X64, X128 SSDsOne question: Are these faster or slower writing than normal drives? I'd really like to know whether that is the case or not, since people kept on bashing on the poor write speeds as the reason to not go to an SSD.]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:46:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/x128+ssd.html"><![CDATA[X128 SSD]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/corsair.html"><![CDATA[Corsair]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/x64.html"><![CDATA[X64]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[BoxedApp SDK 2.1 (Windows)]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://downloads.zdnet.com/abstract.aspx?docid=1074173]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[A developer library for application virtualization providing the ability to create virtual files, virtual registry entries and values. BoxedApp SDK creates a virtual file system and virtual registry. Add virtual files and your application will "think" that such files really exist. No temporary files are created! You create a virtual...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Software downloads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/dynamic-link+library.html"><![CDATA[Dynamic-link Library]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/activex.html"><![CDATA[ActiveX]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/file.html"><![CDATA[File]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/softanics.html"><![CDATA[Softanics]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/boxedapp+sdk.html"><![CDATA[BoxedApp SDK]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/x64.html"><![CDATA[X64]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/activex%252fcom%252fcom%252b%252fdcom.html"><![CDATA[ActiveX/COM/COM+/DCOM]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/.net.html"><![CDATA[.Net]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/c%2523.html"><![CDATA[C#]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/programming+languages.html"><![CDATA[Programming Languages]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/middleware.html"><![CDATA[Middleware]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/c%252fc%252b%252b.html"><![CDATA[C/C++]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/software+development.html"><![CDATA[Software Development]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/software%252fweb+development.html"><![CDATA[Software/Web Development]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/enterprise+software.html"><![CDATA[Enterprise Software]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/software.html"><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Is an IBM purchase of Red Hat inevitable?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10532-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=64593&messageID=1202240&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Is an IBM purchase of Red Hat inevitable?Jboss would complement Websphere?Really?  Is that like how MySQL is going to complement Oracle's flagship product?  Doesn't make sense to me, these products are in direct competition with eachother.I think the biggest threat to RedHat's business model is CentOS.  Smart...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 07:41:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[OPEN SOURCE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/unix.html"><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/servers.html"><![CDATA[Servers]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/storage.html"><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ibm+corp..html"><![CDATA[IBM Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/red+hat+inc..html"><![CDATA[Red Hat Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/sun+microsystems+inc..html"><![CDATA[Sun Microsystems Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/x64.html"><![CDATA[X64]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/linux.html"><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/sun+t2.html"><![CDATA[Sun T2]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/server.html"><![CDATA[server]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">IBM</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">RHT</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">JAVA</category>
		<category domain="tickers">IBM,RHT,JAVA</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Why x86 is perfectly fine for now]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-17923-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=50466&messageID=947274&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Why x86 is perfectly fine for nowAgreed - But demand drives progressEverything you say is true, but the more people who say I want 64bit and I want it now, the more progress you will see in 64bit apps and drivers.  If 64bit demand is low, companies will turn...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 07:54:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+x86.html"><![CDATA[Intel x86]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/x64.html"><![CDATA[X64]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/x86+is.html"><![CDATA[x86 IS]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vista+x64.html"><![CDATA[Vista x64]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Why x86 is perfectly fine for now]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/igeneration/?p=383]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[I, and most people use, a 32-bit (x86) version of Windows. "So what?" you may think, and rightly so. I've been looking into 64-bit (x64) Windows for a while now and I cannot see any advantages. Ed can, and his article has certainly made me think twice, but I can't...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 07:19:01 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/32-bit.html"><![CDATA[32-bit]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+x86.html"><![CDATA[Intel X86]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ram.html"><![CDATA[RAM]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/x64.html"><![CDATA[X64]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/64-bit.html"><![CDATA[64-Bit]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network+technology.html"><![CDATA[Network Technology]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/semiconductors.html"><![CDATA[Semiconductors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hardware.html"><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/components.html"><![CDATA[Components]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating Systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/software.html"><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/networking.html"><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/zack+whittaker.html"><![CDATA[Zack Whittaker]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Suddenly, 64-bit Windows is mainstream]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12354-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=50264&messageID=943005&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Suddenly, 64-bit Windows is mainstream64bit Vista Ultimate on my ....... HTPC since Beta 1.  A few minor issues with video card drivers, nVidia during beta.  Other then that it has been rock solid and a pleasure to use.Going StrongI have Vista Ultimate x64 on my office, and Sadly,...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 06:46:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+vista+%2528longhorn%2529.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows Vista (Longhorn)]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+vista.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows Vista]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+xp.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows XP]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/64-bit.html"><![CDATA[64-bit]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+vista+ultimate.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/x64.html"><![CDATA[X64]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Windows Home Server gets a big bug fix (and much more)]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12354-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=48541&messageID=904895&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Windows Home Server gets a big bug fix and much moregr8 newsThanks for the update!The next thing i would expect them to update is from WMC 2.0 to WMC 4.0 that would solve all my issues with streaming content to Xbox 360 and will position WHS not only as a...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 13:34:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+vista+%2528longhorn%2529.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows Vista (Longhorn)]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/x64.html"><![CDATA[X64]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/big+bug+fix.html"><![CDATA[big bug fix]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windows+home.html"><![CDATA[Windows Home]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+home+server.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows Home Server]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/server.html"><![CDATA[server]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[More Vista SP1 answers]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12354-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=44389&messageID=820147&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[More Vista SP1 answersA bigger question needed to be answer,Where can I download it now? I have searched microsoft.com and google, but could only find reviews and release notes, but not where I can download it. I do not want to wait until march.Vista Ultimate x64 SP1Ed;   I...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 07:12:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+vista+%2528longhorn%2529.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows Vista (Longhorn)]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/third-party+driver.html"><![CDATA[Third-party driver]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/kevin+remde.html"><![CDATA[Kevin Remde]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/adobe+premiere.html"><![CDATA[Adobe Premiere]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+vista.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows Vista]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/x64.html"><![CDATA[X64]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/sp1.html"><![CDATA[SP1]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/xp+x64.html"><![CDATA[XP x64]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vista+x64.html"><![CDATA[Vista x64]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/x86-version.html"><![CDATA[x86-version]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+xp.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows XP]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[For some categories, Vista x64 support is still scarce]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12354-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=42542&messageID=785059&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[For some categories, Vista x64 support is still scarceA real shameThanks, Ed.  It really is a shame.  I think the fingerprint reader is great. I'll continue to use it on my x86 PC.  Too bad as I really find it convenient and would love to use it...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 23:08:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+vista+%2528longhorn%2529.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows Vista (Longhorn)]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+xp.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows XP]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/x64.html"><![CDATA[X64]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+vista.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows Vista]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Microsoft releases handful of Vista bug fixes]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=336]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft has released a number of updates for Windows Vista:Update for Windows Vista (KB931671)Update for Windows Vista for x64-based Systems (KB931671)Install this update to resolve an issue where an error message is received when placing a Windows Vista system into a sleep state while a PPP connection is active.Update for...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 15:51:31 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+vista+%2528longhorn%2529.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows Vista (Longhorn)]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+vista.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows Vista]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/x64.html"><![CDATA[X64]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Windows Server 2003 SP2 is out]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12558-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=31276&messageID=578872&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Windows Server 2003 SP2 is outx64 link is to checked versionMary Jo, I would change the link to the x64 download.  Right now it's pointing to the checked aka debug version of the service pack.I couldn't find the retail (aka non-checked) version of the x64 service pack.  The...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+xp+service+pack+2.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 2]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/servers.html"><![CDATA[Servers]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/right+now+it.html"><![CDATA[Right Now IT]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/x64.html"><![CDATA[X64]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windows+server+2003+sp2.html"><![CDATA[Windows Server 2003 SP2]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+server+2003.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows Server 2003]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/service+pack+2.html"><![CDATA[Service Pack 2]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+server.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows Server]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Choosing between Vista x86 32 bit or x64 64 bit]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10533-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=31024&messageID=574800&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Choosing between Vista x86 32 bit or x64 64 bitThe benefit will come."For home users, there's no real benefit of x64. Period."It will come. Software is always getting bigger as hardware advances, and we'll hit that 4 GB barrier sooner than you think. Already with Vista 1 GB is becoming...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 04:23:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network+technology.html"><![CDATA[Network technology]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/pci.html"><![CDATA[PCI]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/novell+opensuse.html"><![CDATA[Novell OpenSuse]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/x64.html"><![CDATA[X64]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/64-bit.html"><![CDATA[64-bit]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+vista.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows Vista]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Choosing between Vista x86 32 bit or x64 64 bit]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/?p=440]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the more common questions I hear about Vista is which bit version of Windows Vista should one get.  Do we go with x86 32 bit edition or x64 64 bit edition?  Im going to try to clear that question up as best as I can and...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 03:41:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel.html"><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/amd.html"><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/desktop.html"><![CDATA[Desktop]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hardware.html"><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mobile%252fwireless.html"><![CDATA[Mobile/Wireless]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vista.html"><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Virtual PC 2007 is out!]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=264]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft has just made Virtual PC 2007 available for free download no validation required.  Its available in 32-bit and 64-bit versions.The following operating systems are supported as both host and guests:Windows Vista BusinessWindows Vista EnterpriseWindows Vista UltimateWindows Server 2003Standard EditionWindows Server 2003Standard x64 EditionWindows XP ProfessionalWindows XP Professional x64...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 10:32:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/virtual+machines.html"><![CDATA[Virtual Machines]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[64 is the new 32]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12354-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=27721&messageID=519787&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[64 is the new 32Actually, the REAL barrier is the hardware drivers"The real barrier to wider adoption of 64-bit technology isn't hardware or the OS. It's the lack of compelling software."You're right that compelling x64 software is rare for most consumer applications but I don't see that as too big...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 16:46:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network+technology.html"><![CDATA[Network technology]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/irony.html"><![CDATA[irony]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/server.html"><![CDATA[server]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/64-bit.html"><![CDATA[64-bit]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/x64.html"><![CDATA[X64]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hardware.html"><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/filesync.html"><![CDATA[FileSync]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+system.html"><![CDATA[operating system]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/barrier.html"><![CDATA[barrier]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="tickers">INTC</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[InfoWorld: Startup aims to simplify x64 Exchange upgrades]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/Brill/?p=67]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[     InfoWorld writes about Azaleos and theirvalue-add plans around the Exchange 12 upgrade plan.  The quotes arefrom Keith McCall, who worked on the Exchange team at Microsoft as wellas with the Domino "Dot" products (.Action, .Merchant) back inthe day at Lotus::Microsoft's plan for Exchange 12...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2005 14:11:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/exchange.html"><![CDATA[Exchange]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
