<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[wintel scalability Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/wintel+scalability.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to wintel scalability]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="1" found="1" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[N-Tier: Rube Goldberg meets Wintel Scalability]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-11202-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=47268&messageID=880158&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[N-Tier: Rube Goldberg meets Wintel ScalabilityStore procedures and serializationHow did stored procedures solve the serialization problem?If they did, it sounds like an accident due to programmers not understanding transactions and unknowingly switching from a very pessimistic locking strategy to an overly optimistic locking strategy.RE: N-Tier: Rube Goldberg meets Wintel ScalabilitySo,...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 04:46:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/databases.html"><![CDATA[Databases]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/n-tier.html"><![CDATA[N-Tier]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/tier.html"><![CDATA[tier]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/wintel+scalability.html"><![CDATA[Wintel Scalability]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/rube+goldberg.html"><![CDATA[Rube Goldberg]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/wintel.html"><![CDATA[Wintel]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
