<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[windowsupdate Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windowsupdate.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to windowsupdate]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="1" found="1" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[New virus hitting in-boxes]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-1106-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=1424&messageID=27891&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[New virus hitting in-boxesmissing vulnerable OS descriptionWhy is the simple information as to which operating systems are vulnerable missing from the entire article? Is this a zdnet editorial policy to protect Microsoft from the inevitable negative publicity or are we supposed to assume that all viri infect only Microsoft systems...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2004 14:57:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cyberthreats.html"><![CDATA[Cyberthreats]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/viruses+and+worms.html"><![CDATA[Viruses and worms]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/security.html"><![CDATA[SECURITY]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windowsupdate.html"><![CDATA[WindowsUpdate]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/virus.html"><![CDATA[virus]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/new+virus.html"><![CDATA[New Virus]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/pc.html"><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
