<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[windows 7 build Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windows+7+build.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to windows 7 build]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="16" found="16" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Windows 7 build 7077]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12554-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=63146&messageID=1167282&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Windows 7 build 7077Wake Me When RC1 Is ReleasedHo-hum.Looks like...KDE to me. Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery eh.What does the RC smell like?!Does the RC smell like bubble gum and roses or pixie dust and happy thoughts?RE: Windows 7 build 7077AKH,, 1 paragraph and a couple pics is...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 07:15:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[OPEN SOURCE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/imitation.html"><![CDATA[Imitation]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+7.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows 7]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windows+7+build.html"><![CDATA[Windows 7 Build]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windows+7+build+7077.html"><![CDATA[Windows 7 build 7077]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/kde.html"><![CDATA[KDE]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Windows 7 build 7077 screenshots leaked (Windows 7 build 7077 screenshots leaked)]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-13615-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=63092&messageID=1166154&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Windows 7 build 7077 screenshots leaked (Windows 7 build 7077 screenshots leaked)Win 7 leaksIt doesn't look very different from ver. 7000. Same old stuff with different names. Hopefully it will have fixes for memory looping on startup and file reading from flash drives that reformats your flash drive instead of...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 00:29:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/flash+memory.html"><![CDATA[Flash memory]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windows+7+build+7077.html"><![CDATA[Windows 7 build 7077]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windows+7+build.html"><![CDATA[Windows 7 Build]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windows+7+build+7077+screenshot.html"><![CDATA[Windows 7 build 7077 screenshot]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+7.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows 7]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Windows 7 build 7077 screenshots leaked]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-13615-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=63040&messageID=1165073&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Windows 7 build 7077 screenshots leakedWOWScreenshots of the about box, desktop, media player, even the START MENU!!!!... OMFG!!!  This is SO EXCITING!  After seeing these I realize just how awesome this new OS is.... I MUST HAVE WINDOWS 7 NOW!  Great piece of journalism.... What a get!RE:...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 04:55:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/blogging.html"><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windows+7+build+7077.html"><![CDATA[Windows 7 build 7077]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windows+7+build+7077+screenshot.html"><![CDATA[Windows 7 build 7077 screenshot]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+7.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows 7]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windows+7+build.html"><![CDATA[Windows 7 Build]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[ (First look: Windows 7 build 7068)]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12554-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=62736&messageID=1158365&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[ (First look: Windows 7 build 7068)Windows 7 LookThe look is dissapointed. It looks almost like Windows Vista. I am a tech and most of my clients will not buy something that they are not confortable with. Some of them are even looking to Apple as a solution. Some do...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:40:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windows+7+build+7068.html"><![CDATA[Windows 7 build 7068]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+7.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows 7]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windows+7+build.html"><![CDATA[Windows 7 Build]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/first+look.html"><![CDATA[First Look]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[First look: Windows 7 build 7068]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12554-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=62693&messageID=1157196&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[First look: Windows 7 build 7068Fixed problemI was running build 7000 in my desktop and a big problem kept coming up. My system for some reason would continue freezing up . The only way to get my computer back running was to hold the power button and restart my computer....]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 05:40:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mapped+drives.html"><![CDATA[Mapped Drives]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+7.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows 7]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windows+7+build+7068.html"><![CDATA[Windows 7 build 7068]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windows+7+build.html"><![CDATA[Windows 7 Build]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/first+look.html"><![CDATA[First Look]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[ (Windows 7 build 7057)]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12554-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=62280&messageID=1147486&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[ (Windows 7 build 7057)Windows 7Windows 7 is not all that great. I have been running it since its release. All I get are slow downs and blue screen of deaths. Mostly because there are very few Window 7 drivers out there,and Vista and XP drivers want work with Win...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:59:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+7.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows 7]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windows+7+build+7057.html"><![CDATA[Windows 7 Build 7057]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windows+7+build.html"><![CDATA[Windows 7 Build]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/win+7.html"><![CDATA[Win 7]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Windows 7 build 7057 - Performance results #1]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12554-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=62181&messageID=1145446&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Windows 7 build 7057 - Performance results #1Win 7 PerformanceWin 7 appears to be winning the game but it is a bit relative.  Personally I am still on XP but will probably switch to Win 7 in the future completely bypassing Vista.  A significant observation, in my opinion...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 10:36:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+vista+%2528longhorn%2529.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows Vista (Longhorn)]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/performance.html"><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/win+7.html"><![CDATA[Win 7]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+xp.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows XP]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+7.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows 7]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Windows 7 build 7057 - Performance results #2]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12554-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=62035&messageID=1142862&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Windows 7 build 7057 - Performance results #2Haven't rtried this one yetjust wondering if you might have any ideas why my results with the 64bit betas has been so contrary to yours.It would be nice to have better performance than XP, but I'm not seeing it on a AMD Althon64...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 06:39:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/performance+management.html"><![CDATA[Performance management]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+xp.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows XP]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windows+7+build+7057.html"><![CDATA[Windows 7 Build 7057]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/performance.html"><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windows+7+build.html"><![CDATA[Windows 7 Build]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/gb+ram.html"><![CDATA[GB RAM]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+7.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows 7]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Windows 7 build 7057 - Performance that blasts past XP, Vista and previous builds]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12554-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=62030&messageID=1142847&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Windows 7 build 7057 - Performance that blasts past XP, Vista and previous buildsWill you be able to post the actual times?Just wondering.a lot of work, but...where's the beef.Many people don't care about windoze anymore.The real test can be only against Linux and OSX.You must care linux geekAs your here...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 06:22:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/performance+management.html"><![CDATA[Performance management]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+vista+%2528longhorn%2529.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows Vista (Longhorn)]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/linux.html"><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+7.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows 7]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windows+7+build+7057.html"><![CDATA[Windows 7 Build 7057]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windows+7+build.html"><![CDATA[Windows 7 Build]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/xp+vista.html"><![CDATA[XP Vista]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/performance.html"><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+vista.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows Vista]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Intel Win 7 benchmark results (Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best? )]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12554-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=61811&messageID=1138781&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Intel Win 7 benchmark results (Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best? )These results are worthless because...How many people have 1 Gig of memory..???Anyone with one gig of memory, does not have 64 bit capability...You should have compared...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:51:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+vista+%2528longhorn%2529.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows Vista (Longhorn)]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/performance+management.html"><![CDATA[Performance management]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/performance.html"><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+xp.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows XP]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+7.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows 7]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+win+7.html"><![CDATA[Intel Win 7]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/xp+performance+shootout.html"><![CDATA[XP performance shootout]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windows+7+build+7048.html"><![CDATA[Windows 7 Build 7048]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windows+7+build.html"><![CDATA[Windows 7 Build]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/xp+performance.html"><![CDATA[XP Performance]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vista+v.html"><![CDATA[Vista V]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/shootout.html"><![CDATA[shootout]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windows+7+beta+1.html"><![CDATA[Windows 7 Beta 1]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windows+7+beta.html"><![CDATA[Windows 7 Beta]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microso.html"><![CDATA[Microso]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12554-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=61787&messageID=1138530&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?Although I'm not a fan of pre-release comparisons......it's interesting to note that W7 does indeed appear to be a very effective OS.As for the 64 bit question, with Quad Core largely becoming...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 06:29:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+vista+%2528longhorn%2529.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows Vista (Longhorn)]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/performance.html"><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/take-away.html"><![CDATA[take-away]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+7.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows 7]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+vista.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows Vista]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/xp+performance+shootout.html"><![CDATA[XP performance shootout]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+xp.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows XP]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windows+7+build.html"><![CDATA[Windows 7 Build]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windows+7+beta+1.html"><![CDATA[Windows 7 Beta 1]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windows+7+build+7048.html"><![CDATA[Windows 7 Build 7048]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/shootout.html"><![CDATA[shootout]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/xp+perform.html"><![CDATA[XP Perform]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[First look at Windows 7 build 7048]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12554-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=61691&messageID=1136636&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[First look at Windows 7 build 70488 Years Ago8 Years ago OSX was released and ran on 400 MHz G3 PPCs that had been released a full decade ago. The RAM requirement was 128 MB.Adrian...I'm wondering... Is there a trick to getting this build installed? Each ISO I've tried blue...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 11:51:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+7.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows 7]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+internet+explorer.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windows+7+build+7048.html"><![CDATA[Windows 7 build 7048]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ram.html"><![CDATA[RAM]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+system.html"><![CDATA[operating system]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Windows 7 build 7048 - Desktop (First look at Windows 7 build 7048)]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12554-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=61695&messageID=1136547&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Windows 7 build 7048 - Desktop (First look at Windows 7 build 7048)Good lord!Did you HAVE to choose that wallpaper?Why not put the numbers on CALC?On the enlarged icon for Calculator, they could at least put the numbers and symbols on it.LMAONT]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 11:10:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/desktop.html"><![CDATA[desktop]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windows+7+build+7048.html"><![CDATA[Windows 7 build 7048]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windows+7+build.html"><![CDATA[Windows 7 Build]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+7.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows 7]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[ (First Look - Windows 7 build 7022)]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12554-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=60773&messageID=1118432&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[ (First Look - Windows 7 build 7022)Ever notice that Windows keeps getting lower and lowerWe start in Windows 95, looking at the sky.  Then Windows XP is at the ground level, but looking over the hills.   Windows Vista is partially in the grass. Now with Windows...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:01:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+vista+%2528longhorn%2529.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows Vista (Longhorn)]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windows+7+build+7000.html"><![CDATA[Windows 7 Build 7000]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+7.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows 7]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/first+look.html"><![CDATA[First Look]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/information+technology.html"><![CDATA[information technology]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+vista.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows Vista]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Windows 7 build 7022]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12554-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=60764&messageID=1118303&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Windows 7 build 7022Release DatesI think general release will be October or so, but I know nothing.I do wonder, though, if Apple and Microsoft are playing a game of release-date chicken with Snow Leopard and Win7. My suspicion is that Snow Leopard will be revealed at WWDC and available 90-120...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:15:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+7.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows 7]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/snow+leopard.html"><![CDATA[Snow Leopard]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Windows 7 build 7022 leaked]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12554-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=60691&messageID=1116706&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Windows 7 build 7022 leakedWhen I get more face-time ...... I'll let you know.Screenshot galleryI've posted a screenshot gallery of the latest build seen on the web, 10 builds higher than 7022: http://content.zdnet.com/2346-17923_22-267756.htmlI kept hearing performance and stability were already greatWas that an exaggeration, or is MS (or whatever your...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 08:04:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/performance+management.html"><![CDATA[Performance management]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+7.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows 7]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/beta.html"><![CDATA[beta]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/performance.html"><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
