<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[windows 7 build 7048 Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windows+7+build+7048.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to windows 7 build 7048]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="4" found="4" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Intel Win 7 benchmark results (Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best? )]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12554-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=61811&messageID=1138781&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Intel Win 7 benchmark results (Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best? )These results are worthless because...How many people have 1 Gig of memory..???Anyone with one gig of memory, does not have 64 bit capability...You should have compared...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:51:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+vista+%2528longhorn%2529.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows Vista (Longhorn)]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/performance+management.html"><![CDATA[Performance management]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/performance.html"><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+xp.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows XP]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+7.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows 7]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+win+7.html"><![CDATA[Intel Win 7]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/xp+performance+shootout.html"><![CDATA[XP performance shootout]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windows+7+build+7048.html"><![CDATA[Windows 7 Build 7048]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windows+7+build.html"><![CDATA[Windows 7 Build]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/xp+performance.html"><![CDATA[XP Performance]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vista+v.html"><![CDATA[Vista V]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/shootout.html"><![CDATA[shootout]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windows+7+beta+1.html"><![CDATA[Windows 7 Beta 1]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windows+7+beta.html"><![CDATA[Windows 7 Beta]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microso.html"><![CDATA[Microso]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12554-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=61787&messageID=1138530&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?Although I'm not a fan of pre-release comparisons......it's interesting to note that W7 does indeed appear to be a very effective OS.As for the 64 bit question, with Quad Core largely becoming...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 06:29:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+vista+%2528longhorn%2529.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows Vista (Longhorn)]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/performance.html"><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/take-away.html"><![CDATA[take-away]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+7.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows 7]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+vista.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows Vista]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/xp+performance+shootout.html"><![CDATA[XP performance shootout]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+xp.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows XP]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windows+7+build.html"><![CDATA[Windows 7 Build]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windows+7+beta+1.html"><![CDATA[Windows 7 Beta 1]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windows+7+build+7048.html"><![CDATA[Windows 7 Build 7048]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/shootout.html"><![CDATA[shootout]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/xp+perform.html"><![CDATA[XP Perform]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[First look at Windows 7 build 7048]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12554-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=61691&messageID=1136636&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[First look at Windows 7 build 70488 Years Ago8 Years ago OSX was released and ran on 400 MHz G3 PPCs that had been released a full decade ago. The RAM requirement was 128 MB.Adrian...I'm wondering... Is there a trick to getting this build installed? Each ISO I've tried blue...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 11:51:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+7.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows 7]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+internet+explorer.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windows+7+build+7048.html"><![CDATA[Windows 7 build 7048]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ram.html"><![CDATA[RAM]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+system.html"><![CDATA[operating system]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Windows 7 build 7048 - Desktop (First look at Windows 7 build 7048)]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12554-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=61695&messageID=1136547&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Windows 7 build 7048 - Desktop (First look at Windows 7 build 7048)Good lord!Did you HAVE to choose that wallpaper?Why not put the numbers on CALC?On the enlarged icon for Calculator, they could at least put the numbers and symbols on it.LMAONT]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 11:10:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/desktop.html"><![CDATA[desktop]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windows+7+build+7048.html"><![CDATA[Windows 7 build 7048]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windows+7+build.html"><![CDATA[Windows 7 Build]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+7.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows 7]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
