<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[w2k8 Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/w2k8.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to w2k8]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="2" found="2" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Microsoft shows off App-V virtualization for servers]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12558-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=64341&messageID=1195564&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft shows off App-V virtualization for serversTechnology sounds intruigingFor client deployments, this could become the preferred way for deploying apps in the enterprise. From what I understand about it, it would eliminate application incompatibility issues when PC OSs are upgraded in the enterprise, and would allow applications to be deployed...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 10:08:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/emperor.html"><![CDATA[emperor]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/server.html"><![CDATA[server]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/w2k8.html"><![CDATA[W2K8]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/app-v.html"><![CDATA[APP-V]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+system.html"><![CDATA[operating system]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/virtualization.html"><![CDATA[virtualization]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Make no bones about it: Server 2008 R2 is really Windows Server 7]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-17924-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=64010&messageID=1188481&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Make no bones about it: Server 2008 R2 is really Windows Server 764-bit required for memoryThe 64-bit only limitation makes since because virtualization is memory constrained more than CPU.  PAE works but there is a performance hit.  I believe the trend in large enterprise environments is a minimal...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 14:36:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/smb%252fsme.html"><![CDATA[SMB/SME]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network+technology.html"><![CDATA[Network technology]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/now+it.html"><![CDATA[NOW IT]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/server+2008.html"><![CDATA[Server 2008]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/server+2008+r2.html"><![CDATA[Server 2008 R2]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/64-bit.html"><![CDATA[64-bit]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/server.html"><![CDATA[server]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/memory.html"><![CDATA[memory]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+server.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows Server]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
