<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[vms Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vms.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to vms]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="8" found="8" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[From Chapter Two: The appliance computing culture]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-11202-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=51901&messageID=976289&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[From Chapter Two: The appliance computing cultureA correction(?)[i]and a new proprietory OS called VMS - that eventually became the basis for Microsoft Windows NT 4.0[/i]The first version of Windows NT was 3.5, not 4.0.Also, I think its not correct to say VMS formed the basis of NT. It is true...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 02:20:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+nt.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows NT]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/digital+equipment+corp..html"><![CDATA[Digital Equipment Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vms.html"><![CDATA[VMS]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/data-processing.html"><![CDATA[data-processing]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[From Chapter Two: The appliance computing culture]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/Murphy/?p=1241]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[The strangest thing about the IBM System 38, now sold as the i5, is that IBM has consistently under-sold and under rated what has been, since the beginning, its best technical product. by Paul Murphy]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 00:15:58 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ibm+iseries.html"><![CDATA[IBM iSeries]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/theory.html"><![CDATA[Theory]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/rdbms.html"><![CDATA[RDBMS]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/digital+equipment+corp..html"><![CDATA[Digital Equipment Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/unix.html"><![CDATA[Unix]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/machine.html"><![CDATA[Machine]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ibm+corp..html"><![CDATA[IBM Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vms.html"><![CDATA[VMS]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/phone+book.html"><![CDATA[Phone Book]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/databases.html"><![CDATA[Databases]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/storage.html"><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating Systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/enterprise+software.html"><![CDATA[Enterprise Software]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/software.html"><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/data+management.html"><![CDATA[Data Management]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hardware.html"><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/paul+murphy.html"><![CDATA[Paul Murphy]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">IBM</category>
		<category domain="tickers">IBM</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[About the Windows Server 2008 stack]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-11202-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=43718&messageID=808669&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[About the Windows Server 2008 stackNeed to corre t your article linkthe link is half the articlebut good points about MS centric users who haven't looked outside their little worldRE: About the Windows Server 2008 stackI believe the Windows registry predates MS getting any influence from the VMS world. (In...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 01:05:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ipv6.html"><![CDATA[IPv6]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+server+2008.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows Server 2008]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vms.html"><![CDATA[VMS]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windows+server+2008+stack.html"><![CDATA[Windows Server 2008 stack]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+server.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows Server]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/registry.html"><![CDATA[registry]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/unix.html"><![CDATA[Unix]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[A difference in philosophy]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-11202-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=43669&messageID=807908&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[A difference in philosophyDeveloper HandholdingMS has worked hard to develop software components that can be used to more efficiently build robust software.  This is a Good Thing, and I don't think it is in the least bit inconsistent with "Unix" philosophy.The problem is, when faced with a choice between...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 07:12:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/apple+inc..html"><![CDATA[Apple Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/unix.html"><![CDATA[Unix]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vms.html"><![CDATA[VMS]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AAPL</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">AAPL,MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Itanium gives OpenVMS new lease on life]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-3513-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=7533&messageID=152112&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Itanium gives OpenVMS new lease on lifeIt worked thenIf an OS works well, then why go to something new like Windows or Linux.  If I remember, Unix was a contemporary of VMS and UNIX needed to be rebranded as Linux in order to make a modest comeback.  VMS,...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2005 12:30:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/unix.html"><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vms.html"><![CDATA[VMS]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hp+openvms.html"><![CDATA[HP OpenVMS]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/linux.html"><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+itanium.html"><![CDATA[Intel Itanium]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[HP to rejuvenate OpenVMS on Monday]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-3513-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=7522&messageID=151844&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[HP to rejuvenate OpenVMS on MondayVMSWMS was a great OS. I worked with it for several years (mid- to late-80s) on the VAX and MicroVAX platforms. Even *nix and Linux don't compare, in my opinion.Carl RapsonA brief wlalk down memory laneOh, VMS and the VAX....My first real taste of Enterprise...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2005 14:46:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/linux.html"><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/64-bit.html"><![CDATA[64-bit]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hewlett-packard+co..html"><![CDATA[Hewlett-Packard Co.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hp+openvms.html"><![CDATA[HP OpenVMS]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ibm+corp..html"><![CDATA[IBM Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vms.html"><![CDATA[VMS]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/unix.html"><![CDATA[Unix]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/digital+equipment+corp..html"><![CDATA[Digital Equipment Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">HPQ</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">IBM</category>
		<category domain="tickers">HPQ,IBM</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Check Point's optimistic pessimist]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-1009-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=6026&messageID=122584&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Check Point's optimistic pessimistCheck Point's optimistic pessimistHow about making securemote client start when I want it to and not on every boot up?Someone got it right"Microsoft historically picked the VMS approach. It actually hired the same guy who was in charge of VMS development."Back in the day,  it was...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2004 11:34:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vms.html"><![CDATA[VMS]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/optimistic+pessimist.html"><![CDATA[optimistic pessimist]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/pessimist.html"><![CDATA[pessimist]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/check+point+software+technologies+ltd..html"><![CDATA[Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">CHKP</category>
		<category domain="tickers">CHKP</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[HP brings OpenVMS to the SuperDome]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-3513-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=3165&messageID=66203&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[HP brings OpenVMS to the SuperDomeToo tought to kill!Better than "just good enough".Stop rewriting history!!The first 64bit Alpha VMs systems were brought out by *Digital*!  Porting to 64bit is nothing new, many of us did it then.  We've been waiting for the rest of the world to catch...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2004 11:33:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mainframes.html"><![CDATA[Mainframes]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/servers.html"><![CDATA[Servers]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vaxen.html"><![CDATA[VAXen]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vms.html"><![CDATA[VMS]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/superdome.html"><![CDATA[Superdome]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hp+openvms.html"><![CDATA[HP OpenVMS]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hewlett-packard+co..html"><![CDATA[Hewlett-Packard Co.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">HPQ</category>
		<category domain="tickers">HPQ</category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
