<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[vivaki Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vivaki.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to vivaki]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="1" found="1" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[VivaKi, dude, where is my code?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10535-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=49109&messageID=918537&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[VivaKi, dude, where is my code?Geesh!Do you think it's possible that an ad company might use the term "open source" in a different sense than the coding community?  Consider that "open source" was used in the intelligence community PRIOR to being used in the coding community and it does...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 07:40:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cyberthreats.html"><![CDATA[Cyberthreats]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/geesh.html"><![CDATA[Geesh]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vivaki.html"><![CDATA[VivaKi]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/spam.html"><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hormel.html"><![CDATA[Hormel]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
