<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[verizon and vonage Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/verizon+and+vonage.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to verizon and vonage]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="8" found="8" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Vonage-Verizon patent infringement hearing today: but no decision yet]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/ip-telephony/?p=1849]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Colleague Anne Broache reports that a federal appeals court weighing the patent case that Verizon filed against  Vonage heard arguments earlier today but did not immediately reach a  decision.Anne thinks that one hint about what the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit may be  thinking...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 13:27:45 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vonage.html"><![CDATA[Vonage]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/verizon.html"><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/regulatory.html"><![CDATA[Regulatory]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/news.html"><![CDATA[News]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Verizon to court: why is Vonage objecting to our Patents NOW?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/ip-telephony/?p=1665]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[InternetNews reports that on Thursday, Verizon urged a federal appeals court to reject Vonage's contention  that a recent Supreme Court decision on obviousness justifies the reversal of a  $58 million infringement judgment against the Internet telephony company.  Verizon had written in its appeal that the April 30...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 21:08:09 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/news.html"><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/verizon.html"><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vonage.html"><![CDATA[Vonage]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Vonage: we want a do-over in Verizon patent infringement trial]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/ip-telephony/?p=1581]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Vonage has asked the U.S. Appeals Court for the Federal Circuit to shelve its Verizon patent infringement judgement and send the case back to a lower court for retrial.The impetus: a unanimous opinion released by the Supreme Court on Monday, seen by some as a rework of Patent infringement law....]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 10:08:32 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vonage.html"><![CDATA[Vonage]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/verizon.html"><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/patents.html"><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/general.html"><![CDATA[General]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Verizon vs. Vonage: Is WSJ ad department taking sides?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/ip-telephony/?p=1572]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul Kapustka at GigaOm has unearthed some information that appears to paint the picture that The Wall Street Journals ad department is either quite sympathetic to, or quite afraid of, Verizons reaction to Vonages ads for Vonages FreeToCompete.com website.Last night, Paul wrote:When we looked at the back page of Friday&rsquo;s...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 08:51:58 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vonage.html"><![CDATA[Vonage]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/verizon.html"><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/general.html"><![CDATA[General]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Vonage: when we battle Verizon, we're fighting "The Man"]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/ip-telephony/?p=1568]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[ Well, if Vonage cant totally convince regulators, legislators, and judges of the righteousness of its cause, then Vonage can always try impressing us.The people, man. Thatd be all Americans of voting age that dont happen to be regulators, legislators or judges.Thats the only reason I can think of for...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:51:43 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vonage.html"><![CDATA[Vonage]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/general.html"><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/verizon.html"><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Vonage vs. Verizon: how will the Appeals Court rule tomorrow?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/ip-telephony/?p=1556]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Tomorrow, Vonage will ask an appeals court to extend a freeze of a  lower court order that bars it from signing up new customers during the length of an appeals process of a ruling against Vonage in its patent infringement suit against Verizon.Last Tuesday, Vonage put out a statement...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 12:12:06 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vonage.html"><![CDATA[Vonage]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/verizon.html"><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/regulatory.html"><![CDATA[Regulatory]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/general.html"><![CDATA[General]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Vonage: Verizon patent suit could bankrupt us]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=4870]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[      Vonage said the Verizon patent suit could force the VOIP provider into bankruptcy. Vonage made that statement in its annual report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. While the Verizon patent suit was expected to be a risk factor for Vonage bankruptcy goes...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 17:30:06 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vonage.html"><![CDATA[Vonage]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/general.html"><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/voip.html"><![CDATA[VOIP]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/verizon.html"><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Vonage cops to "no workaround": which means they could be totally screwed if...]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/ip-telephony/?p=1537]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Vonage now says they have no "workaround" that could be deployed if a U.S. Appeals Court does not grant a stay in its patent infringement dispute with Verizon.That appeal for a stay will be heard a week from tomorrow. "Vonage currently has no workarounds that moot the need for ...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 09:38:43 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vonage.html"><![CDATA[Vonage]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/verizon.html"><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/general.html"><![CDATA[General]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
