<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[trixbox Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/trixbox.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to trixbox]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="3" found="3" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Beware of the TrixBox: Redux]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-13602-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=60687&messageID=1116565&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Beware of the TrixBox: ReduxNeeds to do everythingOpen Source must do both functionality and features. It's true trixbox 'hijacked' code with its own packaging. But so what? There are others trying to fill the void (ie. PBX-in-a-flash).FreePBX is the main web interface to asterisk and both of these are free...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 05:56:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/trixbox.html"><![CDATA[Trixbox]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/redux.html"><![CDATA[Redux]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/freepbx.html"><![CDATA[FreePBX]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Beware of the TrixBox: Redux]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/Greenfield/?p=280]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[      My post yesterday referencing Mercian Labelâ€™s saga of moving to Fonalityâ€™s TrixBox drew fire on both sides of the open source debate. TrixBox is a VoIP appliance that Fonally bills as installing "quickly in an all-in-one solution."    Many were vehemently opposed...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:36:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/phone.html"><![CDATA[Phone]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/fonality.html"><![CDATA[Fonality]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/trixbox.html"><![CDATA[TrixBox]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/telecom+%2526+utilities.html"><![CDATA[Telecom & Utilities]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/dave+greenfield.html"><![CDATA[Dave Greenfield]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/dave+greenfield.html"><![CDATA[Dave Greenfield]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Beware of the TrixBox]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-13602-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=60572&messageID=1114135&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Beware of the TrixBoxmisleading titlewell based on reading the article, it seems one ought not to necessarily beware of trixbox, but to beware of the HUD feature in certain circumstances or of poor network configuration and network interface settings.RE: Beware of the TrixBoxtrixbox deployments go well for those that have...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 06:06:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/telephony.html"><![CDATA[Telephony]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/voip.html"><![CDATA[VOIP]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hud.html"><![CDATA[HUD]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/trixbox.html"><![CDATA[Trixbox]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network.html"><![CDATA[network]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
