<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[tom-tom Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/tom-tom.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to tom-tom]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="10" found="10" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Bob Dylan to voice GPS? Who do you want directing your drive?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-13615-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=68430&messageID=1305525&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Technically it should be a woman's voice as men are more likely to listen to it. But if I had to pick, I'd say Johnny Depp as Captain Jack Sparrow.RE: Bob Dylan to voice GPS? Who do you want directing your drive?hmm... I'd rather listen to a woman's voice, but...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:14:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/bob+dylan.html"><![CDATA[Bob Dylan]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/voice.html"><![CDATA[voice]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/gps.html"><![CDATA[GPS]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[TomTom pays Microsoft and settles patent-infringement dispute]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12558-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=62662&messageID=1156198&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[TomTom pays Microsoft and settles patent-infringement disputeRE: TomTom pays Microsoft and settles patent-infringement disputeAnd the winner is Microsoft just like we all predicted. I still won't be buying any TomTom products due to their actions. Obviously there is something to the Microsoft patents and the linux vendors who did the...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:35:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/linux.html"><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[OPEN SOURCE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/tomtom.html"><![CDATA[TomTom]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/tom-tom.html"><![CDATA[Tom-Tom]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[TomTom, Microsoft settle: Who caved?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10532-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=62660&messageID=1156180&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[TomTom, Microsoft settle: Who caved?It almost seems like TomTom was expecting this... as fast as they reacted.. seems like they had a contingency plan.  I imagine they also wanted to ensure their stock didnt crumble.Its interesting how fast MS agreed though.  Maybe it wasnt that big of a...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:24:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/tomtom.html"><![CDATA[TomTom]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/patent.html"><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[TomTom chooses a moderate limited hang out route]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10535-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=62294&messageID=1147801&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[TomTom chooses a moderate limited hang out routeM$ must pay for IPTomTom can not do a cross license with M$, unless M$ cover all Linux distros.We know that M$ patents are worthless, so M$ should pay now for the IP stolen from TomTom.TomTom must pay for IPMicrosoft can not do...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 07:26:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/tom-tom.html"><![CDATA[Tom-Tom]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/tomtom.html"><![CDATA[TomTom]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/patent.html"><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Windows 7 (7057) leaks to the web]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-17923-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=61991&messageID=1142361&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Windows 7 (7057) leaks to the webAre they seeking ......prosecution for these so called "leaker" as they are Tom Tom?So you see "Tom Tom", NDA doesn't matter."Windows 7 (7057) leaks beta 3 to the web"One must say that is creative, change beta for leaked. :DHence, if you tolerate leakers, you...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 09:11:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/web.html"><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+7.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows 7]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/tom-tom.html"><![CDATA[Tom-Tom]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/leaker.html"><![CDATA[leaker]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+system.html"><![CDATA[operating system]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Microsoft's secret plan behind the TomTom suit?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9595-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=61644&messageID=1135670&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft's secret plan behind the TomTom suit?Well, maybe it is time to draw a line in the sand. Maybe this is a good onefor SFLC, IBM, and other to get involved with. TomTom can not fight it alone, they will just have to switch to WinCE.not so secretM$ hopes that...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 13:04:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/linux.html"><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[OPEN SOURCE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/tomtom.html"><![CDATA[TomTom]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/secret+plan.html"><![CDATA[secret plan]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Open source patent law panhandling]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10535-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=61612&messageID=1135270&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Open source patent law panhandlingthen someone should help thenIBM should step up and provide aid  just the step up to MS ..you Wanna war punk ill give you one and push it until the case is done  prove it one and for all ....  prepare the way...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 08:10:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/tom-tom.html"><![CDATA[Tom-Tom]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/tomtom.html"><![CDATA[TomTom]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/linux.html"><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/sco+group+inc..html"><![CDATA[SCO Group Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/patent.html"><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/octoshaft.html"><![CDATA[Octoshaft]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">SCOX Q</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT,SCOX Q</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[With Tom Tom suit, is Microsoft going after Linux?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-11155-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=61441&messageID=1131943&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[With Tom Tom suit, is Microsoft going after Linux?Obviously, this IS about Linux. The FAT implementation is GPL, and part ofthe kernel. This is all about making Linux devices more expensive and creating fear around using Linux in devices. But, it could backfire if FAT patents are invalidated. Look for...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 08:07:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/unix.html"><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[OPEN SOURCE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/linux.html"><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/tom-tom.html"><![CDATA[Tom-Tom]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/patent.html"><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+going.html"><![CDATA[MICROSOFT GOING]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Bang the TomTom slowly]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10535-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=61367&messageID=1130626&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Bang the TomTom slowlyBang the TomTom slowly but surely"TomTom's use of the Linux kernel in its products, ..."The fact of the matter is, the "Linux Kernel" was mentioned by name.^o^Still, if we let MS keep threatening, and demanding cross licensingagreements for invalid patents, it helps validate invalid patents. One at...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:12:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[OPEN SOURCE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/unix.html"><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/tomtom.html"><![CDATA[TomTom]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/tom-tom.html"><![CDATA[Tom-Tom]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/linux.html"><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Linux Foundation ready to fight Microsoft if TomTom lawsuit involves Linux kernel]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10535-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=61354&messageID=1130528&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Linux Foundation ready to fight Microsoft if TomTom lawsuit involves Linux kernelA mixed barrel of fish.There are so many threads in this mess that one can look at almost anything. But some things come out loud and clear:1. We are in a post-Bilski situation......software patents (which seem to be at...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 03:25:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[OPEN SOURCE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/unix.html"><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/linux.html"><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/linux+kernel.html"><![CDATA[Linux kernel]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/tom-tom.html"><![CDATA[Tom-Tom]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/tomtom.html"><![CDATA[TomTom]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/patent.html"><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
