<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[thomas-rasset Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/thomas-rasset.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to thomas-rasset]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="4" found="4" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Justice says $1.9 million verdict is constitutional]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://government.zdnet.com/?p=5240]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Jammie Thomas-Rasset was hit with a $1.9 million verdict for filesharing 24 songs -- roughly $80,000 per song. Is that even constitutional? Thomas-Rasset's lawyers filed an appeal saying it's not. Friday, the Justice Department weighed in with an opinion that it is PDF.    Under the Copyright Act's...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:46:50 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/damage.html"><![CDATA[Damage]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/thomas-rasset.html"><![CDATA[Thomas-Rasset]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/richard+koman.html"><![CDATA[Richard Koman]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Thomas-Rasset to appeal $1.9m verdict]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-11155-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=66407&messageID=1252473&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Thomas-Rasset to appeal $1.9m verdictShe sure did ask for it.By sharing copyright protected songs. She should stop trying to blame the RIAA for her predicament. Regardless of the appropriateness or not of the $1.9M award two juries have found her guilty of willful infringement. Own up to it and take...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 11:34:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/litigation.html"><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/digital+media.html"><![CDATA[Digital media]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/riaa.html"><![CDATA[RIAA]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/thomas-rasset.html"><![CDATA[Thomas-Rasset]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Imagining a real-world verdict in Thomas-Rasset case]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-11155-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=65916&messageID=1237479&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Imagining a real-world verdict in Thomas-Rasset caseShe lost...twice.Not only that but she was found to be willfully infringing. Time to dispose of the far reaching defenses and realize the RIAA was completly in the right in this case. As for the award...that's a whole different discussion.It is amazing what results...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 20:32:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/thomas-rasset.html"><![CDATA[Thomas-Rasset]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Wow! Jury verdict in Capitol v Thomas-Rasset: $2 million]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-11155-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=65850&messageID=1235221&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow! Jury verdict in Capitol v Thomas-Rasset: $2 millionWas Thomas-Rasset hurting the RIAA, the recording artists, or both?I use iTunes Plus so I couldn't care less, but I agree - that verdict seems extreme...RIAA, Sony, EMI, Warner, Universal - the evil quartetEveryone also take a special moment to wish Mitch...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:49:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/thomas-rasset.html"><![CDATA[Thomas-Rasset]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
