<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[talk about fail Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/talk+about+fail.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to talk about fail]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="1" found="1" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Vote for open source]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10535-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=64872&messageID=1208263&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Vote for open sourceTalk about FAIL...Why do you need these kinds of desperate measures just to get something accepted when it is supposed to be so much better to begin with?  Can't it stand on its own?OSS, the ultimate FAIL.Pathetic, really...OSS needs some form of affirmative actionEU should learn...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 08:39:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/party+discipline.html"><![CDATA[Party Discipline]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/oss.html"><![CDATA[OSS]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/talk+about+fail.html"><![CDATA[Talk about FAIL]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
