<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[take-away Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/take-away.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to take-away]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="2" found="2" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12554-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=61787&messageID=1138530&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best?Although I'm not a fan of pre-release comparisons......it's interesting to note that W7 does indeed appear to be a very effective OS.As for the 64 bit question, with Quad Core largely becoming...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 06:29:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+vista+%2528longhorn%2529.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows Vista (Longhorn)]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/performance.html"><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/take-away.html"><![CDATA[take-away]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+7.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows 7]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+vista.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows Vista]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/xp+performance+shootout.html"><![CDATA[XP performance shootout]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+xp.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows XP]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windows+7+build.html"><![CDATA[Windows 7 Build]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windows+7+beta+1.html"><![CDATA[Windows 7 Beta 1]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windows+7+build+7048.html"><![CDATA[Windows 7 Build 7048]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/shootout.html"><![CDATA[shootout]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/xp+perform.html"><![CDATA[XP Perform]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[What's the take-away from Apple slashing iPhone production?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12554-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=53862&messageID=1018954&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[What's the take-away from Apple slashing iPhone production?Approaching End Of Cycle?MacRumors also points out that it's been 116 days since the 3G was released, and it was 126 days between the first iPhone and the 3G. Is it possible that Apple is looking at the end of the life cycle...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 20:24:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/3g.html"><![CDATA[3G]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cellular+phones.html"><![CDATA[Cellular phones]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/obama.html"><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/apple+inc..html"><![CDATA[Apple Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/iphone+production.html"><![CDATA[iPhone Production]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/apple+iphone.html"><![CDATA[Apple iPhone]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/take-away.html"><![CDATA[take-away]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AAPL</category>
		<category domain="tickers">AAPL</category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
