<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[sugar-coated dopewar Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/sugar-coated+dopewar.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to sugar-coated dopewar]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="1" found="1" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[CandyWars, a sugar-coated DopeWars, is approved by App Store]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-11408-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=56608&messageID=1070884&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[CandyWars, a sugar-coated DopeWars, is approved by App StoreNo, the story is.......that Apple at least has the backbone to restrict overtly inappropriate Apps from the App Store.Yes it is Apple's definition of "inappropriate", but at least it's something.RE: CandyWars, a sugar-coated DopeWars, is approved by App StoreApple Rules, Seems its...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 14:57:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/app+store.html"><![CDATA[App Store]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/candywars.html"><![CDATA[CandyWars]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/sugar-coated+dopewar.html"><![CDATA[sugar-coated DopeWar]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/dopewars.html"><![CDATA[DopeWars]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/apple+inc..html"><![CDATA[Apple Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AAPL</category>
		<category domain="tickers">AAPL</category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
