<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[sudden jump Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/sudden+jump.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to sudden jump]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="1" found="1" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Can Twitter's backbone handle sudden jump in popularity?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10532-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=63177&messageID=1168225&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Can Twitter's backbone handle sudden jump in popularity?IT Infrastructure and Unexpected GrowthInteresting post. It seems as if the cost factor vexed Twitter from the beginning. There's no way that Twitter management could have made the case for an expensive mainframe--much less two--upon founding the company. [i]Who would have guessed that...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 05:04:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mainframes.html"><![CDATA[Mainframes]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/twitter.html"><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/sudden+jump.html"><![CDATA[sudden jump]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
