<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[standards bodies Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/standards+bodies.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to standards bodies]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="2" found="2" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Intense interest in Microsoft Office standard]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10535-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=42294&messageID=780151&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Intense interest in Microsoft Office standardHigher up the tree[i]The underlying question remains this. Is standards-setting a judicial or a political process? Even if it is a judicial process, should such a process ignore politics, or be informed by it?[/i]I beg to differ.  The underlying question is, "what is the...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 10:35:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/quality.html"><![CDATA[Quality]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/opendocument+format+%2528odf%2529.html"><![CDATA[OpenDocument Format (ODF)]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+word.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Word]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/standards.html"><![CDATA[standards]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ooxml.html"><![CDATA[OOXML]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+office.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Office]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/standards+bodies.html"><![CDATA[Standards Bodies]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[XML grows up as XBRL]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10535-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=22396&messageID=425430&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[XML grows up as XBRLStandardsWhen open standards are involved, protocols can flourish. So, I have no doubt this will have legs.http://opendomain.blogspot.com/Further thoughts on the XBRL taxonomies as open sourceDana Blankenhorn is absolutely correct in his conclusion that XBRL is lowering the cost of doing business which is good for companies...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 09:53:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/financial+accounting.html"><![CDATA[Financial accounting]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/standards+bodies.html"><![CDATA[Standards Bodies]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/xml.html"><![CDATA[XML]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/xbrl.html"><![CDATA[XBRL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/taxonomy.html"><![CDATA[taxonomy]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/financial+reporting.html"><![CDATA[financial reporting]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/financial.html"><![CDATA[financial]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
