<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[standard windows argument Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/standard+windows+argument.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to standard windows argument]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="20" found="360" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Microsoft confirms 'detailed' Windows 7 exploit]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12691-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=71658&messageID=1383636&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Ummm interesting....so just block 139 and 445...445? great that port aggain.Is SMB blocked to/from internet by th firewall by default?RE: Microsoft confirms 'detailed' Windows 7 exploitPorts 139 and 445 are blocked by default for Internet access by Windows firewall in Windows 7 and any commerical hardware firewall. They are enabled...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:54:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/firewalls.html"><![CDATA[Firewalls]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/smb%252fsme.html"><![CDATA[SMB/SME]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/smb+protocol.html"><![CDATA[SMB protocol]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+7.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows 7]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/firewall.html"><![CDATA[firewall]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windows+7+exploit.html"><![CDATA[Windows 7 exploit]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/small+and+medium+business.html"><![CDATA[small and medium business]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+vista.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows Vista]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+system.html"><![CDATA[operating system]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Groklaw suggests Microsoft sue, do over authentication]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10535-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=71585&messageID=1381466&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Are you in any way trying to legitimize patent trolling?You are well aware that what Microsoft is doing is what we all used to call patent trolling aren't you?My guess...Nothing will happen... this is just MS trying to protect UAC and runas from paten lawsuits.Besides MS would be idiot... well...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 06:39:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[OPEN SOURCE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/unix.html"><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/authentication.html"><![CDATA[authentication]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/groklaw.html"><![CDATA[Groklaw]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/patent.html"><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/red+hat+inc..html"><![CDATA[Red Hat Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">RHT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT,RHT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Is Google's Go language worth teaching or learning?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12355-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=71505&messageID=1379592&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[How manny more languages...... does one need to just doConsole.out.println("Hello world!");?RE: Is Google's Go language worth teaching or learning?I always wonder what Google will do next. They always surprise me. Go looks promising.Google wants to be just as dominant...if not more so...than M$.So one more way to get there is...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:56:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/c%252fc%252b%252b.html"><![CDATA[C/C++]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/programming+languages.html"><![CDATA[Programming languages]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/development+tools.html"><![CDATA[Development tools]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/bing.html"><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/pascal.html"><![CDATA[Pascal]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/google+inc..html"><![CDATA[Google Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">GOOG</category>
		<category domain="tickers">GOOG</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Worm inflicts Rick Astley wallpaper on jailbroken iPhones]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12554-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=71380&messageID=1376673&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[But... but... but... OS X is Unix! It is immune!Hmm, guess not.Now, let's list the "attacks" and then cue the double standards...1. iPhone must have the [b]worst[/b] security model out there because hackers only go after the low hanging fruit.2. I don't care [b]why[/b] no one attacks Windows Mobile, all...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 20:55:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/smart+phones.html"><![CDATA[Smart phones]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/nonzealot.html"><![CDATA[NonZealot]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/apple+iphone.html"><![CDATA[Apple iPhone]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/security.html"><![CDATA[security]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[The real pros and cons of server virtualization]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-11202-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=71366&messageID=1376155&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[YepVMwear is starting to look like Windoze - adding unneeded functionality just because it can. Moving VMs around from server to server live - is COOL. But why do you need it? If you are on a consolidation binge and utilization is king, then there will be no "extra" capacity...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 02:22:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/linux.html"><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/unix.html"><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/servers.html"><![CDATA[Servers]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/virtualization.html"><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/server+virtualization.html"><![CDATA[server virtualization]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vmwear.html"><![CDATA[VMwear]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/server.html"><![CDATA[server]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Sneak Preview: Chrome OS Browser Video Tour]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-17924-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=70444&messageID=1352203&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Another videoThere's another video on a blog at http://chromeos-blog.com that also shows the browser. It's 3 mins.RE: Sneak Preview: Chrome OS Browser Video TourWith Google in the fight against MS over MS tying\bundling their browser to their OS, can someone explain to me why its ok for Google to make...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 04:42:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/web+browsers.html"><![CDATA[Web browsers]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/google+inc..html"><![CDATA[Google Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/web+browser.html"><![CDATA[Web browser]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+system.html"><![CDATA[operating system]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chrome.html"><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">GOOG</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">GOOG,MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[How to jailbreak the iPhone 3GS]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-11408-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=70452&messageID=1352027&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Why does Apple persistI am amazed the game of cat and mouse Apple users must play to get a phone that they can do with as they please. The same people who openly criticize Microsoft for all and sundry, but the beloved Steve Jobs whom it appears must own their...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 22:14:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/smart+phones.html"><![CDATA[Smart phones]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/pwnage.html"><![CDATA[Pwnage]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/apple+iphone.html"><![CDATA[Apple iPhone]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/steve+jobs.html"><![CDATA[Steve Jobs]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/apple+inc..html"><![CDATA[Apple Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/jailbreak.html"><![CDATA[jailbreak]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AAPL</category>
		<category domain="tickers">AAPL</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Vista/IE market share slide, Win 7/Firefox/Chrome surge]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12554-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=69876&messageID=1337647&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[IE "Hit"I never understood this...."Internet Explorer?s market share also took a battering, dropping by a massive 1.26%, taking its market share to a new low of 65.7%. This is a huge hit for Microsoft."What kind of hit? IE could go away and MS wouldn't lose a dime because it seems...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 06:09:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/web+browsers.html"><![CDATA[Web browsers]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/marketshare.html"><![CDATA[MarketShare]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+internet+explorer.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chrome.html"><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/web+browser.html"><![CDATA[Web browser]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mozilla+firefox.html"><![CDATA[Mozilla Firefox]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+vista.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows Vista]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[MS Security Essentials test shows 98% detection rate for 545k malware samples]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12691-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=69849&messageID=1337021&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[I have to defend Microsoft on this...I have to defend Microsoft on this because Symantec is probably the [i]last[/i] company to be complaining.I can't tell you how many computers I've "fixed" simply by removing any and all Symantec/Norton products from a computer, then installing Avast or AVG.Symantec makes some of...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 10:36:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cyberthreats.html"><![CDATA[Cyberthreats]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/spyware%252c+adware+%2526+malware.html"><![CDATA[Spyware, adware & malware]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/viruses+and+worms.html"><![CDATA[Viruses and worms]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/symantec+corp..html"><![CDATA[Symantec Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/heuristics.html"><![CDATA[heuristics]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/security.html"><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/detection+rate.html"><![CDATA[detection rate]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/malware.html"><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">SYMC</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT,SYMC</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[The month ahead: Can Windows 7 close the Vista flop chapter?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10532-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=69807&messageID=1335793&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Win7 cannot completely close the Vista flop chapter. Win7 is still WAY too bloated and inflexible, a take it all or leave it approach. Compare that with Linux where you can use it from a tiny embedded system all the way up to a large server with multiple cores and...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:51:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+vista+%2528longhorn%2529.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows Vista (Longhorn)]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/unix.html"><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/desktops.html"><![CDATA[Desktops]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+7.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows 7]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/win7.html"><![CDATA[Win7]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+vista.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows Vista]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/linux.html"><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+system.html"><![CDATA[operating system]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Averatec D1133 All-In-One]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://review.zdnet.com/product/desktops/averatec-d1133-all-in-one/33771012]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Does a certain price make a nonmobile computer a Nettop? How about a particular CPU or case design? The Averatec D1133 All-In-One blurs the lines. Its low price and relatively slow performance make an argument for calling it a Nettop. But even though it's slow by conventional PC standards, thanks...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Product reviews]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 01:36:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/netbooks%252c+nettops+%2526+mids.html"><![CDATA[Netbooks, nettops & MIDs]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/monitors+%2526+displays.html"><![CDATA[Monitors & displays]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/averatec+inc..html"><![CDATA[Averatec Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/nettop.html"><![CDATA[nettop]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Can Linux beat the bloat]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10535-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=69588&messageID=1331289&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the whole "bloated" thing is hogwash.There's no such thing.Neither Windows nor Linux are "bloated". Nor is OS/X. You want functionality you have to pay for it. One man's lean and mean is another man's anemic.Functionality simply isn't free.How many lines of code did USB take? How about multi-threading?...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 07:33:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/unix.html"><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[OPEN SOURCE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ubuntu+9.04.html"><![CDATA[Ubuntu 9.04]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/linux.html"><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ubuntu.html"><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/os%252fx.html"><![CDATA[OS/X]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/linus.html"><![CDATA[Linus]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/bloat.html"><![CDATA[bloat]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/kernel.html"><![CDATA[kernel]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Red Hat CEO vs. Torvalds: More Linux features don't equate to bloat]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10532-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=69537&messageID=1329461&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Linux distro appliances are the futureCompanies are wising up and getting away from MS 20G worm/virus operating systems and going to Linux distro driven appliances.It is the future with appliances no one needs a Windows OS with Office for someone to open a (.doc) to edit it is a security...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 05:56:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[OPEN SOURCE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/companies.html"><![CDATA[COMPANIES]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/red+hat+inc..html"><![CDATA[Red Hat Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/linux.html"><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/desktop.html"><![CDATA[desktop]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">RHT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">RHT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Palm tattles on Apple, finds itself in the hot seat instead]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10532-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=69497&messageID=1328451&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Why?Apple has been proven to be far worse then Palm(read: Google Voice App), so what goes around, should come around.Untill Aplle confesses, and discontinue their shenanigans when it comes to apps on their devices, then they have no reason to voice any indignation against those that do the same thing...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:33:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/digital+music.html"><![CDATA[Digital music]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/digital+media.html"><![CDATA[Digital media]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/apple+inc..html"><![CDATA[Apple Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/palm+inc..html"><![CDATA[Palm Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/usb.html"><![CDATA[USB]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/google+inc..html"><![CDATA[Google Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AAPL</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">GOOG</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">PALM</category>
		<category domain="tickers">AAPL,GOOG,PALM</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Google exec calls for ISPs to get tough on botnets]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12691-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=69476&messageID=1328221&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[I can't agree with a requirement for active A/V.I don't need nor want useless A/V software on my systems.Its inappropriate for an ISP to scan MY machine..for paid access to the interent (when they want to claim they are a "dumb pipe"). If I am spewing out malware - sure,...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 08:14:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/internet+service+providers+%2528isps%2529.html"><![CDATA[Internet service providers (ISPs)]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cyberthreats.html"><![CDATA[Cyberthreats]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/google+inc..html"><![CDATA[Google Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/internet+service+provider.html"><![CDATA[Internet Service Provider]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/a%252fv.html"><![CDATA[A/V]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/malware.html"><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+system.html"><![CDATA[operating system]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/security.html"><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">GOOG</category>
		<category domain="tickers">GOOG</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Why I Can Never Be Exclusive to Linux and Open Source on the Desktop]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-17924-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=69352&messageID=1325633&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[It uses WINEBut I've noticed a number of performance issues and stability problems with it.ActuallyAs far as I've ever able to tell there's no practical difference between Picasa on Windows and Linux. StevenActually, it uses WineLib, so that it is more like a native application.But there are still all the...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 17:54:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/unix.html"><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/desktop.html"><![CDATA[desktop]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/linux.html"><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Hands on: 32GB Zune HD walk around and first impressions]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12553-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=69214&messageID=1322837&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[By that rationale...an iPhone must be compared to netbooks as they are "[i]the same type of device capable of the same type of tasks and are accordingly in the same price range.[/i]"Should the Zune HD be compared with the iPod Touch?I see the Zune as being a media player first...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 06:40:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/digital+music.html"><![CDATA[Digital music]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/digital+media.html"><![CDATA[Digital media]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/notebooks.html"><![CDATA[Notebooks]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/zune+premium+headphones.html"><![CDATA[Zune Premium Headphones]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+zune.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Zune]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/zune+hd.html"><![CDATA[Zune HD]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/apple+ipod.html"><![CDATA[Apple iPod]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/apple+ipod+touch.html"><![CDATA[Apple iPod Touch]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Russia drops XP investigation]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12554-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=68857&messageID=1315759&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Finally.That case was BS. XP is old and Microsoft doesn't want to support it anymore. It's not like this was in the books from day 1, they have a set support cycle. Eventually, you have to let it go. Too bad, so sad. Either use Vista/7 or move to a...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 02:06:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mice.html"><![CDATA[Mice]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/unix.html"><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/oem.html"><![CDATA[OEM]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/xp+investigation.html"><![CDATA[XP investigation]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+xp.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows XP]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Culture of cheap: How discount computers cost the consumer]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-13615-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=67847&messageID=1290326&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[The speed of TechThe problem is not cheap, but rapid devaluation. Tech has always had a sweet spot value for price. I am not keen on spending top dollar only to have the hardware devalue by 50% in a week. This is where cheap comes in. If the thing is...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:27:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/productivity.html"><![CDATA[PRODUCTIVITY]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/computer.html"><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/honda+civic.html"><![CDATA[Honda Civic]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/honda+motor+co..html"><![CDATA[Honda Motor Co.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/advertisement.html"><![CDATA[advertisement]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">HMC</category>
		<category domain="tickers">HMC</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA['Custom XML' the key to patent suit over Microsoft Word]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12558-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=67825&messageID=1289786&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Well...It's kind of odd/fun/amusing that Microsoft after doing its big OOXML song and dance is being hoist on its own petard by a patent on custom XML.I do wonder if Microsoft in stumping up OOXML did much at all in the way of diligence with regard to patents on custom...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 07:55:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/xml.html"><![CDATA[XML]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/patent.html"><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/custom+xml.html"><![CDATA[Custom XML]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/custom+inc..html"><![CDATA[Custom Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+word.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Word]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
