<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[standalone firewall Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/standalone+firewall.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to standalone firewall]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="1" found="1" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Rating the standalone firewalls]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10532-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=65585&messageID=1227371&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Rating the standalone firewallsI'm surprised you didn't list Barracuda...I was sure they had a standalone gateway firewall; perhaps my understanding of enterprise level gear is off kilter.Most IT folks I know preferr Barracuda.RE: Rating the standalone firewallsI think instead of standalone firewalls we should go for a UTM product. Cyberoam...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 20:19:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/firewalls.html"><![CDATA[Firewalls]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network+security.html"><![CDATA[Network security]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/security.html"><![CDATA[SECURITY]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cyberoam.html"><![CDATA[Cyberoam]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/standalone+firewall.html"><![CDATA[standalone firewall]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/firewall.html"><![CDATA[firewall]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
