<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[silicondrive iii ssd Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/silicondrive+iii+ssd.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to silicondrive iii ssd]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="1" found="1" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Western Digital begins shipping in-house SiliconDrive III SSDs]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-13615-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=65726&messageID=1231552&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Western Digital begins shipping in-house SiliconDrive III SSDsWonder what this would do for databases.Speed up or bottleneck it?  I would think speed up.  But can it keep up with 100 spindles?]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:38:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/silicondrive+iii+ssd.html"><![CDATA[SiliconDrive III SSD]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/western+digital+corp..html"><![CDATA[Western Digital Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">WDC</category>
		<category domain="tickers">WDC</category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
