<![CDATA[senderid Resources | ZDNet]]> en-us <![CDATA[Hats-off to Microsoft for finally freeing Sender ID! Spammers, take cover]]> Mon, 23 Oct 2006 19:05:00 -0700 MSFT MSFT <![CDATA[Microsoft sets Sender ID free]]> Mon, 23 Oct 2006 17:49:00 -0700 MSFT MSFT <![CDATA[Danger: Authenticating e-mail can break it]]> Wed, 19 Apr 2006 16:48:00 -0700 <![CDATA[Sender ID's fading message]]> Tue, 09 Aug 2005 04:58:00 -0700 <![CDATA[Microsoft pushes spam-filtering technology]]> Wed, 22 Jun 2005 21:14:00 -0700 MSFT MSFT <![CDATA[Anti-spam standard still moving in slow motion]]> Mon, 14 Mar 2005 11:51:00 -0800 MSFT JAVA MSFT,JAVA <![CDATA[Anti-spam standard still moving in slow motion]]> Mon, 14 Mar 2005 11:21:45 -0800 MSFT MSFT <![CDATA[Amazon, others lobby FTC for help fighting spam]]> Mon, 15 Nov 2004 09:24:00 -0800 AMZN MSFT AMZN,MSFT <![CDATA[Microsoft reworks antispam spec to silence critics]]> Mon, 25 Oct 2004 20:31:00 -0700 MSFT MSFT <![CDATA[Open-standard bearers close ranks]]> Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:04:00 -0700 MSFT MSFT <![CDATA[On heels of IETF ruling, AOL bails on SenderID]]> Thu, 16 Sep 2004 14:42:31 -0700 <![CDATA[Patent concerns foil Microsoft anti-spam spec at IETF]]> Tue, 14 Sep 2004 11:40:01 -0700 MSFT MSFT <![CDATA[Sendmail searches for antispam testers]]> Mon, 30 Aug 2004 16:20:00 -0700 <![CDATA[Mr. Spammer, meet Bubba your new cell mate]]> Wed, 25 Aug 2004 08:41:25 -0700 <![CDATA[IETF puts SenderID on the fast track]]> Mon, 23 Aug 2004 06:02:18 -0700 <![CDATA[SenderID anti-spam scheme picks up steam]]> Thu, 12 Aug 2004 14:49:15 -0700 <![CDATA[Ask (for SenderID), and you shall recieve? Not.]]> Wed, 11 Aug 2004 18:21:07 -0700 <![CDATA[Desperately seeking: Widespread adoption of SenderID]]> Wed, 11 Aug 2004 05:29:49 -0700