<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[sender id Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/sender+id.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to sender id]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="12" found="12" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Hats-off to Microsoft for finally freeing Sender ID! Spammers, take cover]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10532-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=26594&messageID=499448&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Hats-off to Microsoft for finally freeing Sender ID! Spammers, take coverDon't let the kool-aid go to your head.SenderID is already being analysed by spammers to exploit to further their profiteering.If it really was that secure, would MS have "set it free" without trying to profit for themselves?I doubt sender ID...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 19:05:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/spam.html"><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/internet+service+providers+%2528isps%2529.html"><![CDATA[Internet service providers (ISPs)]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/sender+id.html"><![CDATA[Sender ID]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/senderid.html"><![CDATA[SenderID]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Microsoft sets Sender ID free]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-1009-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=26574&messageID=499446&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft sets Sender ID freeIt's not a "product" in the normal sense of the word . . .It's not a product in a normal sense of the word. To be precise, SenderID and SPF is a short piece of text on a DNS server telling the receiver which machines are...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 17:49:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cyberthreats.html"><![CDATA[Cyberthreats]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/e-mail.html"><![CDATA[E-mail]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/senderid.html"><![CDATA[SenderID]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/spf.html"><![CDATA[SPF]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/spam.html"><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/sender+id.html"><![CDATA[Sender ID]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Hats-off to Microsoft for finally freeing Sender ID! Spammers, take cover]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=3818]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Although it didn&#39;t open source the technology and there&#39;s no word on whether the open community will embrace it after originally turning tail and running from it years ago, Microsoft has taken a bold and welcome step by changing the terms of availability for its Sender ID anti-spam technology to...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 15:11:39 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/sender+id.html"><![CDATA[Sender ID]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[On sentry duty in your in-box]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-1009-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=20008&messageID=385015&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[On sentry duty in your in-box... and how would this stop spam?the spammers will quickly come up with a way to validate their mail, work through validated servers, trick the system, eventually using this to increase the amount of spam you get and knock out real mail. Remember, whether or...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 05:59:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cyberthreats.html"><![CDATA[Cyberthreats]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/spam.html"><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/e-mail.html"><![CDATA[e-mail]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/domainkey.html"><![CDATA[DomainKey]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/spam+firewall.html"><![CDATA[spam firewall]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/sender+id.html"><![CDATA[Sender ID]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/server.html"><![CDATA[server]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Sender ID's fading message]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-1009-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=12462&messageID=248794&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Sender ID's fading messageWorthless?"About 84 percent of those authenticated messages were spam".  We've calculated that closer to 90% of the SenderID, SPF authenticated messages we receive is Spam - but let's say it is 84%.  So authentication alone is worthless."If we can get to a place where a...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2005 04:58:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/e-mail.html"><![CDATA[E-mail]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/spam.html"><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cyberthreats.html"><![CDATA[Cyberthreats]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/sender+id.html"><![CDATA[Sender ID]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/spf.html"><![CDATA[SPF]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/senderid.html"><![CDATA[SenderID]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Why Microsoft's spam ploy is no solution]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10532-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=11500&messageID=229517&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Why Microsoft's spam ploy is no solutionA suggestion for you.If you don't like it, don't use it.  See how simple that is?Seems UneducatedFirst of all everything causes false positives, and Microsoft is being very clear that publishing your SPF/Sender-ID information in DNS will only help your situation. Much like...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2005 09:46:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cyberthreats.html"><![CDATA[Cyberthreats]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/spam.html"><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/spf.html"><![CDATA[SPF]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/internet+engineering+task+force.html"><![CDATA[Internet Engineering Task Force]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/sender+id.html"><![CDATA[Sender ID]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[The end of e-mail as we know it]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9588-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=9134&messageID=182193&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[The end of e-mail as we know itIdentification != SpamI get spam from companies I know with real addresses. Pretty much every company I've ever had cause to send my email address to sends me unsolicitied advertisements.From my perspective spam = mail I don't won't from identified or unidenfied sources.Filtering...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2005 12:09:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/spam.html"><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/domain+names.html"><![CDATA[Domain names]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/sidf.html"><![CDATA[SIDF]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/spf.html"><![CDATA[SPF]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/e-mail.html"><![CDATA[e-mail]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/sender+id.html"><![CDATA[Sender ID]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/domain.html"><![CDATA[domain]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/txt.html"><![CDATA[TXT]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/server.html"><![CDATA[server]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Microsoft and Sender ID:  Ready or not, here it comes]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=549]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[It's only Tuesday, and already I believe I've found the scariest quote of the week.  In a story regarding the dissolution of an important, Internet Engineering Task Force anti-spam working group see Catastrophic loss for unencumbered standards, CBSNews.com has a report that quotes Microsoft spokesperson Sean Sundwall as saying that...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:53:18 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/sender+id.html"><![CDATA[Sender ID]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Apache says no to Sender ID]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=432]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[The Apache Group pulled its support of the proposed antispam standard Sender ID, saying Microsoft's license requirements are too strict.We believe that the current license is generally incompatible with open source, contrary to the practice of open Internet standards, and specifically incompatible with Apache License 2.0.As developers of open-source e-mail technologies,...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2004 15:05:18 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/sender+id.html"><![CDATA[Sender ID]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Apache, open-source groups wary of Sender ID]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-3513-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=5133&messageID=107303&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Apache, open-source groups wary of Sender IDSo just use SPF"In August, the company collected more than 80 members of the E-mail Service Provider Coalition to tout the benefits of the antispam technology."So just use SPF, the frills MS added were not the core return domain check anyway, that was all...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2004 13:51:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/spam.html"><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/e-mail.html"><![CDATA[E-mail]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/right+now+it.html"><![CDATA[Right Now IT]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/apache+software+foundation.html"><![CDATA[Apache Software Foundation]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/spf.html"><![CDATA[SPF]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/sender+id.html"><![CDATA[Sender ID]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Stopping spam at the source]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-3513-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=4931&messageID=102533&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Stopping spam at the sourceFive years late... and what a mess now !All these wonderful solutions are only five years late and just bandaids to fix a broken system everyone knew about years ago but ignored. Now that e-commerce is about to come to a screaming halt, all of a...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2004 05:46:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/security.html"><![CDATA[SECURITY]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/domain+names.html"><![CDATA[Domain names]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/spf.html"><![CDATA[SPF]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/sender+id.html"><![CDATA[Sender ID]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/spammer.html"><![CDATA[spammer]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hacker.html"><![CDATA[hacker]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/bank.html"><![CDATA[bank]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/spam.html"><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/password.html"><![CDATA[password]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Microsoft touts 'Sender ID' to fight spam, scams]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-1009-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=4766&messageID=99150&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft touts 'Sender ID' to fight spam, scamsBut....in order to take advantage of this wondrous "new" service, you'll have to subscribe to the Microsoft Send-all-your-ID-to-us-over-encrypted-connection service. You just knew these pieces of trash would work their self-interest into the whole charade. I can't wait until the black hats start slapping...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2004 11:20:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/e-mail.html"><![CDATA[E-mail]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/spam.html"><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ip.html"><![CDATA[IP]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/sender+id.html"><![CDATA[Sender ID]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
