<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[security change Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/security+change.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to security change]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="1" found="1" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Vista is taking body blows]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-11535-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=36556&messageID=672796&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Vista is taking body blowsAnd the bogus Valleywag claim gets yet more mentioningThe 2009 claim for SP1 is completely bogus.  The guy (or his "source") pulled that out of his rear end.  It's not coming in 2009, it's coming whenever Server 2008 RTM's, because Vista SP1 and Server...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 08:49:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+vista+%2528longhorn%2529.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows Vista (Longhorn)]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/security+change.html"><![CDATA[security change]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+vista.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows Vista]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/menu+item.html"><![CDATA[menu item]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
