<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[sandcastle Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/sandcastle.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to sandcastle]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="5" found="5" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Microsoft steps up self-policing of its OSI-approved source licenses]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=1471]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[After pulling its "Sandcastle" documentation compiler from its CodePlex repository site for failure to comply with Open Source Initiative terms and conditions, Microsoft is ready to try releasing "Sandcastle" again under one of its OSI-approved licenses. by Mary Jo Foley]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 12:30:10 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/team.html"><![CDATA[Team]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/osi.html"><![CDATA[OSI]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/source+code.html"><![CDATA[Source Code]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/sandcastle.html"><![CDATA[Sandcastle]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/codeplex.html"><![CDATA[CodePlex]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/team+management.html"><![CDATA[Team Management]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/management.html"><![CDATA[Management]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mary+jo+foley.html"><![CDATA[Mary Jo Foley]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[How much will Microsoft's Sandcastle boo-boo hurt?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10535-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=48506&messageID=904673&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[How much will Microsoft's Sandcastle boo-boo hurt?You only tell half the story[i]There remain a large cohort of programmers, partners, and simple fans who will stay with Microsoft and what it chooses to call open source no matter what.[/i]And there remains a large cohort of programmers, partners, and simple fans who...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 08:50:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/sandcastle.html"><![CDATA[Sandcastle]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/foul.html"><![CDATA[foul]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/tripleii.html"><![CDATA[TripleII]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Microsoft apologizes to Open Source Initiative for policy violation]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=1433]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[After outcry from various constituencies over the past couple of days, Microsoft has pulled from its CodePlex site its Sandcastle project for failure to comply with the terms and conditions required in order to be qualify as bona-fide open source.    Sandcastle is a documentation compiler for managed...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 13:08:34 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/osi.html"><![CDATA[OSI]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source+initiative.html"><![CDATA[Open Source Initiative]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/sandcastle.html"><![CDATA[Sandcastle]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mary+jo+foley.html"><![CDATA[Mary Jo Foley]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[A (Microsoft) code name a day: Sandcastle]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12558-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=28029&messageID=525813&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[A Microsoft code name a day: SandcastleThanks MAry about your blog on Sandcastlehttp://blogs.msdn.com/sandcastle/archive/2006/12/06/a-microsoft-code-name-a-day-sandcastle.aspx provides information on why we chose Sandcastle for the code name. Cheers.Anand..]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 22:30:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/blogging.html"><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/sandcastle.html"><![CDATA[Sandcastle]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[A (Microsoft) code name a day: Sandcastle]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=130]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Even though more and more teams at Microsoft seem to be shying away from christening their fledgling products with good, old-fashioned code names &ndash; favoring the ever-so-boring &ldquo;V.Next&rdquo; designation instead --  there are still some who are doing so.   Microsoft code names always have piqued my interest....]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 06:52:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/codename.html"><![CDATA[codename]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/code+names.html"><![CDATA[Code names]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/development+tools.html"><![CDATA[Development tools]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
