<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[s3200 Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/s3200.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to s3200]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="6" found="6" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Onkyo HT-S3200 (black)]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://review.zdnet.com/product/home-theater-systems/onkyo-ht-s3200-black/33560952]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[To date, Onkyo has been the go-to manufacturer for component-based home-theater-in-a-box systems. For 2009, the company has introduced just two new products to the category: the $500 HT-S5200 and the $350 HT-S3200 reviewed here.  The entry-level HT-S3200 may lack some of the niceties we're used to in pricier home...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Product reviews]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 22:28:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/center+channel.html"><![CDATA[center channel]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/onkyo+ht-s3200.html"><![CDATA[Onkyo HT-S3200]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/speaker.html"><![CDATA[speaker]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[FireWire 1600, 3200 approved: Now, USB 3.0 or FireWire?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-13615-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=50317&messageID=944362&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[FireWire 1600, 3200 approved: Now, USB 3.0 or FireWire?My choice: USB 3.0At least for mainstream computing.USB has used a single main interface since it was first introduced.  Being able to use an old-but-still-functional USB device like a mouse, webcam, or cable to a digital camera in a USB 3.0...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:50:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/firewire.html"><![CDATA[FireWire]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/usb.html"><![CDATA[USB]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[FireWire 1600, 3200 approved: Now, USB 3.0 or FireWire?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/gadgetreviews/?p=312]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[In today's news, the IEEE has approved the new FireWire 2008 specification, which will include the S1600 and S3200 standards, running at 1.6Gbps and 3.2Gbps each.    The new IEEE 1394 standards will use the same connectors as FireWire 800 and will be fully compatible with the previous...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:31:43 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ieee.html"><![CDATA[IEEE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/usb.html"><![CDATA[USB]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/tg+daily.html"><![CDATA[TG Daily]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/firewire.html"><![CDATA[FireWire]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/consumer+electronics.html"><![CDATA[Consumer Electronics]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/personal+technology.html"><![CDATA[Personal Technology]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/andrew+nusca.html"><![CDATA[Andrew Nusca]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Panasonic's sub-$800 3CCD 1080p camcorder]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10533-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=42903&messageID=792628&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Panasonic's sub-$800 3CCD 1080p camcorderDownside to FirewareI never really understood that matter of Fireware and only being able to export via real time.  To me, I thought that was a limitation of the Camera, not the Connection.  Unless Firewire was built purely around the thought of moving data...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 05:16:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/panasonic.html"><![CDATA[Panasonic]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/1080p.html"><![CDATA[1080p]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/firewire.html"><![CDATA[FireWire]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/minidv.html"><![CDATA[MiniDV]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/camcorder.html"><![CDATA[camcorder]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/usb+2.0.html"><![CDATA[USB 2.0]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/usb.html"><![CDATA[USB]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[FireWire speeds set to quadruple]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9595-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=42348&messageID=781356&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[FireWire speeds set to quadrupleI think its too lateIt seems the world has settled on USB and I don't see that changing anytime soon.another batle of the 'standards'?Great, now we have Fireware vs USB vs esata... just more reasons to jack up the hardware prices for 'connectivity'.RE: FireWire speeds set...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 09:48:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/usb+3.html"><![CDATA[USB 3]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/firewire.html"><![CDATA[FireWire]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/usb.html"><![CDATA[USB]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/firewire+speed.html"><![CDATA[FireWire speed]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Apple Mac Mini (1.83GHz Intel Core 2 Duo)]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://review.zdnet.com/product/desktops/apple-mac-mini-183ghz-intel-core-2-duo/32564377]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Editor's note: While this is not a hands-on review of this specific model, we did review the higher-end 2.0GHz Mac Mini. This write-up of the 1.83GHz model is based on our experience with the more expensive one, which shares many of the same characteristics. At $599, the 1.83GHz Intel Core...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Product reviews]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:03:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/desktops.html"><![CDATA[Desktops]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+core+2+duo.html"><![CDATA[Intel Core 2 Duo]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/apple+inc..html"><![CDATA[Apple Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/apple+mac+mini.html"><![CDATA[Apple Mac Mini]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/apple+intel+mac+mini.html"><![CDATA[Apple Intel Mac Mini]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/apple+macintosh.html"><![CDATA[Apple Macintosh]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AAPL</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="tickers">AAPL,INTC</category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
