<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[running Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/running.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to running]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="1" found="1" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Running Microsoft Security Essentials]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12554-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=66048&messageID=1240673&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Running Microsoft Security EssentialsI suspect "primitive" was the pointMS has to be able to defend this to the EU. By pointing out that this is meant to be a very basic package and that 3rd party AV vendors can show that, for money, they offer a better product, then everyone...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 11:02:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/performance+management.html"><![CDATA[Performance management]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/security.html"><![CDATA[SECURITY]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/viruses+and+worms.html"><![CDATA[Viruses and worms]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/running+microsoft+security+essentials.html"><![CDATA[Running Microsoft Security Essentials]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/running.html"><![CDATA[Running]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mse.html"><![CDATA[MSE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/performance.html"><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
