<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[release cycle Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/release+cycle.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to release cycle]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="2" found="2" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[The Microsoft (monthly) patch cycle conundrum]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=36]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[In a zero-day world when Windows exploits are circulating for months before Microsoft can get patches ready, should Redmond consider a change in its monthly patch cycle?  The results of a poll in Larry Dignans first take on this issue (42% prefer "as needed" patches from Redmond) was a...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 12:25:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/browsers.html"><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cisco.html"><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/data+theft.html"><![CDATA[Data theft]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/exploit+code.html"><![CDATA[Exploit code]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hackers.html"><![CDATA[Hackers]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/oracle.html"><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/patch+watch.html"><![CDATA[Patch Watch]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/pen+testing.html"><![CDATA[Pen testing]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/punditocracy.html"><![CDATA[Punditocracy]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vulnerability+research.html"><![CDATA[Vulnerability research]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/zero-day+attacks.html"><![CDATA[Zero-day attacks]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[What's next for Debian?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10535-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=11196&messageID=223232&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[What's next for Debian?Seppuku would be niceHackers and forkers - the WORST example of *NIX anywhere. That's Debian.Hmm...... I'd totally disagree.  Debian is one of the better distributions... by far.  The release cycle is *obscene* though.  Shrug.]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2005 05:10:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[OPEN SOURCE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/debian.html"><![CDATA[Debian]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/release+cycle.html"><![CDATA[release cycle]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
