<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[raid 5 Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/raid+5.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to raid 5]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="15" found="15" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[RAIDfail: Don't use RAID 5 on small arrays]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12694-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=64750&messageID=1204971&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[RAIDfail: Don't use RAID 5 on small arraysDroboSo.. the article says not use use RAID 5 - then recommends that the consumer buys a box Drobo - which essentially just operates as a RAID 5 array when its full????  (put in 4 x 1 TB disks and get 3...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 11:52:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/storage.html"><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/robin.html"><![CDATA[Robin]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/raid.html"><![CDATA[RAID]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/raid+5.html"><![CDATA[RAID 5]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[RAIDfail: Don't use RAID 5 on small arrays]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/storage/?p=483]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Big storage companies stopped recommending RAID 5 a couple of years ago. But I still see small 4-drive arrays touting RAID 5 for home and small office use.     Big mistake. You want to save money, but you also want to keep your data. RAID 5 isn't...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 11:14:35 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/data.html"><![CDATA[Data]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/raid+5.html"><![CDATA[RAID 5]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/raid.html"><![CDATA[RAID]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/storage.html"><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hardware.html"><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/robin+harris.html"><![CDATA[Robin Harris]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Comprehending the Tradeoffs Between Deploying Oracle Database on RAID 5 and RAID 10 Storage Configurations]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://whitepapers.zdnet.com/abstract.aspx?docid=1115543]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Redundant Array of Independent Disks RAID technology is used to improve performance and availability of the underlying storage arrays for any application. With RAID implementations, performance is improved by distributing I/O across many physical disks and availability is increased with the data rebuilding capability. But both high availability and high...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[White papers]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/database.html"><![CDATA[Database]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/oracle+corp..html"><![CDATA[Oracle Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/oracle+database.html"><![CDATA[Oracle Database]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/raid+5.html"><![CDATA[RAID 5]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/raid.html"><![CDATA[RAID]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/storage.html"><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hardware.html"><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">ORCL</category>
		<category domain="tickers">ORCL</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Velocity Micro's Windows Home Server for power users]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-13613-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=44693&messageID=824822&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Velocity Micro's Windows Home Server for power usersPerformance justification questionableIt's interesting that the individual from the Velociy Micro does not know that the Windows Home Server is only able to performe a single backup at a time, or that streaming to several PC's at once is limited by the network...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 07:47:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/server.html"><![CDATA[server]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/whs+file.html"><![CDATA[WHS File]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+home+server.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows Home Server]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windows+home.html"><![CDATA[Windows Home]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/raid+5.html"><![CDATA[RAID 5]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hewlett-packard+co..html"><![CDATA[Hewlett-Packard Co.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/storage.html"><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/velocity.html"><![CDATA[Velocity]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/velocity+micro.html"><![CDATA[Velocity Micro]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">HPQ</category>
		<category domain="tickers">HPQ</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Sorry about your broken RAID 5]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12694-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=36542&messageID=672472&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry about your broken RAID 5Still trying to understand your argumentGranting that a URE rate of 10^-15 [1] means that the incidence of two UREs per array approaches unity once the storage system exceeds 10^30 sectors (10^39 bytes, which is a rather large array), what isn't clear is why this...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 13:32:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/storage.html"><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/raid+5.html"><![CDATA[RAID 5]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ure.html"><![CDATA[URE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/raid.html"><![CDATA[RAID]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/disk.html"><![CDATA[disk]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Sorry about your broken RAID 5]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/storage/?p=164]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[You didn't know?I'm sorry I was the one to tell you that RAID 5 is broken today and will be well and truly broken in 2009 (see Why RAID 5 stops working in 2009), but somebody had to do it. The good news is that the industry is ahead of...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:45:24 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/disk+drives.html"><![CDATA[Disk drives]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/raid.html"><![CDATA[RAID]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/raid+5.html"><![CDATA[RAID 5]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/robin+harris.html"><![CDATA[Robin Harris]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/unrecoverable+read+error.html"><![CDATA[unrecoverable read error]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Why RAID 5 stops working in 2009]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12694-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=36299&messageID=668141&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Why RAID 5 stops working in 2009Been doing this for 15 yearsand never have I seen this unless the drive is about ready to take a dump.I've been in the server arena for quite some time and our file servers (which as of late have approached 1-2TB) have never encountered...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 06:39:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/raid.html"><![CDATA[RAID]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/disk.html"><![CDATA[disk]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/raid+5.html"><![CDATA[RAID 5]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/failure+rate.html"><![CDATA[failure rate]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ure.html"><![CDATA[URE]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Why RAID 5 stops working in 2009]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/storage/?p=162]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[The storage version of Y2k? No, it's a function of capacity growth and RAID 5's limitations. If you are thinking about SATA RAID for home or business use, or using RAID today, you need to know why.RAID 5 protects against a single disk failure. You can recover all your data...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 06:18:54 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/raid.html"><![CDATA[RAID]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/disk+drives.html"><![CDATA[Disk drives]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[RAID 1+0 is the Cadillac of RAID]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12694-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=33592&messageID=617078&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[RAID 1+0 is the Cadillac of RAIDNo performance differenceFirst of all, most people tell me RAID10 (1+0) is better than RAID 0+1, but only in the sense that RAID10 has better degraded performance where one of the drives have failed.  No one ever claims that RAID10 is faster than...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 12:35:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/storage.html"><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/oracle+corp..html"><![CDATA[Oracle Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/raid.html"><![CDATA[RAID]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/raid10.html"><![CDATA[RAID10]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/raid5.html"><![CDATA[RAID5]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/raid-1%252b0.html"><![CDATA[RAID-1+0]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/raid+5.html"><![CDATA[RAID 5]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">ORCL</category>
		<category domain="tickers">ORCL</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[RAID 1+0 is the Cadillac of RAID]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/storage/?p=131]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Is RAID 1+0 superiority a myth?My fellow ZDnet blogger, George Ou, makes some strong statements, bolstered by damning performance numbers, that it is. But this wouldn't be the blogosphere if everyone agreed. So I won't.What is RAID 1+0?Sometimes shortened to RAID 10, RAID 1+0 is a particular combination of two...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 17:49:32 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/raid.html"><![CDATA[RAID]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Chunks: the hidden key to RAID performance]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12694-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=33499&messageID=615756&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Chunks: the hidden key to RAID performanceThe "i" got redefined by the industryThe "i" in RAID got redefined by the industry to mean "independent" because they got sick and tired of being questioned about their 500 to 1000 percent premium over identical hard drives on the market that don't carry...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 00:55:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/storage.html"><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/raid+1.html"><![CDATA[RAID 1]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/raid.html"><![CDATA[RAID]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/raid+5.html"><![CDATA[RAID 5]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/raid+performance.html"><![CDATA[RAID performance]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/backup.html"><![CDATA[backup]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/performance.html"><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Quick Recovery for Raid 5 1.09.04 (Windows)]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://downloads.zdnet.com/abstract.aspx?docid=753973]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Quick Recovery for Raid 5 is a do-it- yourself, non-destructive, simple, and easy to use Raid data recovery software, supports IDE, EIDE, SCSI , SATA drives, long file name, having multi-disk and multi-lingual support, simulates previously existing partitions and is read-only. Its unique Guided File Excavation Technology GFETch helps in...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Software downloads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/software.html"><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/data+recovery.html"><![CDATA[Data Recovery]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/disk.html"><![CDATA[Disk]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/recovery.html"><![CDATA[Recovery]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/partition.html"><![CDATA[Partition]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/raid+5.html"><![CDATA[RAID 5]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/unistal+systems.html"><![CDATA[Unistal Systems]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[WinXP Promise FastTrak S150 SX4/SX4000 Series 2.00.0.24 (Windows)]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://downloads.zdnet.com/abstract.aspx?docid=464529]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[WinXP Promise FastTrak S150 SX4/SX4000 Series:The FastTrak SX4000 ATA RAID PCI adapter delivers industry-leading RAID 5 performance at an unprecedented performance-to-price ratio. For companies running popular applications like web services, file/email servers, audio/video streaming and nearline storage, the FastTrak SX4000 opens the world of professional RAID 5 performance and data...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Software downloads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2004 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+xp.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows XP]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/raid+5.html"><![CDATA[RAID 5]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/raid+5+storage+protection.html"><![CDATA[RAID 5 Storage Protection]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/raid.html"><![CDATA[RAID]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/storage.html"><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hardware.html"><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[WinXP Promise FastTrak S150 SX4/SX4000 Series 2.0.0.25 (Windows)]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://downloads.zdnet.com/abstract.aspx?docid=466863]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[WinXP Promise FastTrak S150 SX4/SX4000 Series:The FastTrak SX4000 ATA RAID PCI adapter delivers industry-leading RAID 5 performance at an unprecedented performance-to-price ratio. For companies running popular applications like web services, file/email servers, audio/video streaming and nearline storage, the FastTrak SX4000 opens the world of professional RAID 5 performance and data...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Software downloads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2004 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+xp.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows XP]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/raid+5.html"><![CDATA[RAID 5]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/raid+5+storage+protection.html"><![CDATA[RAID 5 Storage Protection]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/raid.html"><![CDATA[RAID]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/storage.html"><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hardware.html"><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[High-Performance RAID-6: Why and How]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://whitepapers.zdnet.com/abstract.aspx?docid=175389]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[RAID 5 systems are commonly deployed for data protection in most business environments. However, RAID 5 systems only tolerate a single drive failure or unrecoverable media error before losing data. The advent of low-cost SATA drives is prompting RAID vendors to use them in arrays with larger numbers of disks...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Webcasts]]></s:doctype>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/high-performance.html"><![CDATA[High-performance]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/raid+5.html"><![CDATA[RAID 5]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/raid+5+system.html"><![CDATA[RAID 5 System]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/raid.html"><![CDATA[RAID]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/storage.html"><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hardware.html"><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
