<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[quad-core price Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/quad-core+price.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to quad-core price]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="1" found="1" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Quad-core price war breaks out]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-13616-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=56792&messageID=1074779&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Quad-core price war breaks outAMD is the best value for me.Since I don't do much gaming anymore the AMD platform always seem to be the best value. The AMD based motherboards always seem to have a great feature set at a great price and the CPUs always seem to offer...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:09:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/quad-core+price.html"><![CDATA[Quad-core price]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/advanced+micro+devices+inc..html"><![CDATA[Advanced Micro Devices Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/quad-core.html"><![CDATA[quad-core]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processor.html"><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AMD</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="tickers">AMD,INTC</category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
