<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[pure net neutrality Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/pure+net+neutrality.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to pure net neutrality]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="1" found="1" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Why I am against pure net neutrality]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12691-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=61141&messageID=1126239&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Why I am against pure net neutrality100 per cent disagreeLet's compare this to cable TV. Originally all cable providers were supposed to provide a certain amount of channels/bandwidth to public access stations but once they sobbed for similar reasons -- having to monitor for inappropriate content and to keep costs...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 06:23:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/internet+service+providers+%2528isps%2529.html"><![CDATA[Internet service providers (ISPs)]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/net+neutrality.html"><![CDATA[Net Neutrality]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/pure+net+neutrality.html"><![CDATA[pure net neutrality]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/internet+service+provider.html"><![CDATA[Internet Service Provider]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
