<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[police surveillance Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/police+surveillance.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to police surveillance]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="1" found="1" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Police Surveillance: Go Snoop, Yourself]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10532-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=50824&messageID=954159&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Police Surveillance: Go Snoop, YourselfI think there is a balance to be struckI'm not happy with the proliferation of cameras you describe, and am opposed to fishing expeditions on principle.  I'd much rather see more police on the street particularly in high crime areas, and more police officers who...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 11:28:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/corporate+communications.html"><![CDATA[Corporate communications]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/big+brother.html"><![CDATA[Big Brother]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/police+surveillance.html"><![CDATA[Police Surveillance]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/camera.html"><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
