<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[phone and vonage Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/phone+and+vonage.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to phone and vonage]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="4" found="4" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA["You touch the telephone network, you die," analyst says of VoIP woes]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/ip-telephony/?p=2108]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[ FORTUNE Magazine's Stephanie Mehta was wondering what exactly it is that places independent VoIP providers like Rest In Pieces SunRocket, Vonage, and others at such risk.No big secret. They don't own and control their networks, and are thus prone to routing issues as well as the health- or lack...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 07:44:13 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vonage.html"><![CDATA[Vonage]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Vonage a victim of "the long tail?"]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/ip-telephony/?p=1530]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[  You may have heard of the notion of the "long tail." Thats the principle which describes how a collection of products or services with comparably little demand can collectively account for a proportionately larger market share than the big players. Yet from reading remarks by Forrester Research analyst...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 09:42:12 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vonage.html"><![CDATA[Vonage]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/news.html"><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/general.html"><![CDATA[General]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Complete Verizon-Vonage Patent analysis Part Three: 6,359,880]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/ip-telephony/?p=1519]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Time for us to kick around the third in the three disputed Verizon Patents at the heart of the infringement claims against Vonage.Thats be Verizon Patent 6,359,880 - Public wireless/cordless internet gateway.Abstract:A localized wireless gateway system provides wireless telephone  communication, and for at least interexchange communication, provides voice ...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 06:59:08 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vonage.html"><![CDATA[Vonage]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/general.html"><![CDATA[General]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Complete Verizon-Vonage patent analysis Part One: 6,282,574]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/ip-telephony/?p=1517]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[My interpretation: I agree with Om that the technology described here is so generic that a claim for infringement is highly unlikely. Entitled  Method, server and telecommunications system for name translation on a conditional basis and/or to a telephone number, Verizons U.S. Patent 6,282,574 refers to:An enhanced name translation...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 06:57:55 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vonage.html"><![CDATA[Vonage]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/regulatory.html"><![CDATA[Regulatory]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/general.html"><![CDATA[General]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
