<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[peer-reviewed credibility Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/peer-reviewed+credibility.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to peer-reviewed credibility]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="1" found="1" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Scitable brings peer-reviewed credibility to the Wikipedia age]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12355-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=64085&messageID=1190338&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Scitable brings peer-reviewed credibility to the Wikipedia ageVery interestingWhat a great post, you out did yourself on this one. I wonder what the cost is going to be?"many" Wikipedia entries are accurate and reliableIt's hard to understand your love of Wikipedia when, as you suggest in your first paragraph, the...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 22:48:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/wiki.html"><![CDATA[Wiki]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/wikipedia.html"><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/peer-reviewed+credibility.html"><![CDATA[peer-reviewed credibility]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/scitable.html"><![CDATA[Scitable]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
