<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[pc world Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/pc+world.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to pc world]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="18" found="18" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[The best of the "Best of CES"]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/computers/?p=315]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[The Consumer Electronics Show wrapped up on Sunday, and by now the many Best of CES lists have been posted. Every year there are a few blockbusters that show up on nearly everyone's list. This year the darlings were the Palm Pre and the Sony VAIO P Series, a tiny...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 06:29:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/consumer+electronics+show.html"><![CDATA[Consumer Electronics Show]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/sony+corp..html"><![CDATA[Sony Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/phone.html"><![CDATA[Phone]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/pc.html"><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/palm+inc..html"><![CDATA[Palm Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/samsung+electronics+co.+ltd..html"><![CDATA[Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/lg+electronics+inc..html"><![CDATA[LG Electronics Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/pc+world.html"><![CDATA[PC World]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/laptop+computer.html"><![CDATA[Laptop Computer]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/yahoo+tech.html"><![CDATA[Yahoo Tech]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/pc+magazine.html"><![CDATA[PC Magazine]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/desktops.html"><![CDATA[Desktops]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ultramobile+pcs+%2528umpcs%2529.html"><![CDATA[Ultramobile PCs (UMPCs)]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hardware.html"><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/tablets.html"><![CDATA[Tablets]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/notebooks+%2526+tablets.html"><![CDATA[Notebooks & Tablets]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/emerging+technologies.html"><![CDATA[Emerging Technologies]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/john+morris.html"><![CDATA[John Morris]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/john+morris.html"><![CDATA[John Morris]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">PALM</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">SEC</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">SNE</category>
		<category domain="tickers">PALM,SEC,SNE</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[With Google likely out, who's new bidder for spectrum?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://government.zdnet.com/?p=3646]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Some spectrum watchers are now saying that Google has bowed out of the so-called C block auction for the nationwide 700MHz spectrum. But there are still two active bidders in that auction, presumably Verizon and AT&T.    As I mentioned yesterday, what had looked like the winning bid...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 14:24:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/google+inc..html"><![CDATA[Google Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/verizon+communications+inc..html"><![CDATA[Verizon Communications Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/pc+world.html"><![CDATA[PC World]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/at%2526t+corp..html"><![CDATA[AT&T Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/spectrum.html"><![CDATA[Spectrum]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/richard+koman.html"><![CDATA[Richard Koman]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">T</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">GOOG</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">VZ</category>
		<category domain="tickers">T,GOOG,VZ</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[PC World gets it wrong: as Vonage goes, so not necessarily goes VoIP]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10537-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=42404&messageID=782757&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[PC World gets it wrong: as Vonage goes, so not necessarily goes VoIPAgree!I have to agree. I work from home, rack up 4,000 - 5,000 minutes a month and all on Vonage with very few outages or problems. In my work, I can't afford outages and Vonage has performed very...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 12:57:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/telephony.html"><![CDATA[Telephony]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/manufacturing.html"><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vonage+holdings+corp..html"><![CDATA[Vonage Holdings Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/pc+world.html"><![CDATA[PC World]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/voip.html"><![CDATA[VoIP]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">VG</category>
		<category domain="tickers">VG</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[PC World gets it wrong: as Vonage goes, so not necessarily goes VoIP]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/ip-telephony/?p=2885]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[It disappoints, but does not amaze me, how journalists on deadline sometimes cite rough patches being experienced by Vonage  or Skype and then make a giant leap to conclude that VoIP is hosed.    Take for instance the almost-always-clued-in Dan Tynan of PC World.   ...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 03:18:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/networking.html"><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/pc+world.html"><![CDATA[PC World]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/russell+shaw.html"><![CDATA[Russell Shaw]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/telecommunications.html"><![CDATA[Telecommunications]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/telephony.html"><![CDATA[Telephony]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/voip.html"><![CDATA[VOIP]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vonage+holdings+corp..html"><![CDATA[Vonage Holdings Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">VG</category>
		<category domain="tickers">VG</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Vista and Leopard both make it onto PC World's "Biggest Tech Disappointments of 2007"]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12554-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=42332&messageID=781138&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Vista and Leopard both make it onto PC World's "Biggest Tech Disappointments of 2007"The reason - Multiple ProcessorsI can not speak of Leopard but Vista is a problem where the "Why and How" is well known. This time last year it was clear that the Vista team had built its...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 05:44:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+vista+%2528longhorn%2529.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows Vista (Longhorn)]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/pc+world.html"><![CDATA[PC World]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+vista.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows Vista]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+system.html"><![CDATA[operating system]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/leopard.html"><![CDATA[Leopard]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/collaborator.html"><![CDATA[collaborator]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/team.html"><![CDATA[team]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">INTC,MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Vista and Leopard both make it onto PC World's "Biggest Tech Disappointments of 2007"]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=1045]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Well there's a surprise - both Vista and Leopard make it onto PC World's "Biggest Tech Disappointments of 2007."    Face it - Elvis is dead and both Vista and Leopard failed to make grab the hearts of users in the way that their makers hoped they would.Â ...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 04:45:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+vista.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows Vista]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/pc+world.html"><![CDATA[PC World]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/leopard.html"><![CDATA[Leopard]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+vista+%2528longhorn%2529.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows Vista (Longhorn)]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating Systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/software.html"><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/adrian+kingsley-hughes.html"><![CDATA[Adrian Kingsley-Hughes]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Peter Gutmann turns to smear tactics with help from PCWorld NZ]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/?p=718]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Update 9/1/2007 - Gutmann paper cites shoddy web forum postings as sourceÂ Â     Peter Gutmann - the man who admittedly never used Vista and author of the widely cited and widely discredited paper "A Cost Analysis of Windows Vista Content Protection" - has taken his fight in to...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 22:15:36 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/problem.html"><![CDATA[Problem]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/blog.html"><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+vista.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows Vista]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/pc+world.html"><![CDATA[PC World]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/slide.html"><![CDATA[Slide]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/gutmann.html"><![CDATA[Gutmann]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/peter+gutmann.html"><![CDATA[Peter Gutmann]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/george+ou.html"><![CDATA[George Ou]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Peter Gutmann turns to smear tactics with help from PCWorld NZ]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10533-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=38199&messageID=700430&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter Gutmann turns to smear tactics with help from PCWorld NZAbsolutelyAlthough I notice that your post is now on Keall's blog, albeit with an addendum initialed CK, presumably Chris Keall, criticising your description of O'Neill's original article.I have to admit I would have expected some sort of apology/notice of correction...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 06:37:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/blogging.html"><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/blog.html"><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chris+keall.html"><![CDATA[Chris Keall]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/font.html"><![CDATA[font]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/peter+gutmann.html"><![CDATA[Peter Gutmann]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/attack.html"><![CDATA[attack]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/pc+world.html"><![CDATA[PC World]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Rich Internet Applications make big splash on PCWorld's top 25 sites to watch]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12516-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=35151&messageID=647446&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Rich Internet Applications make big splash on PCWorld's top 25 sites to watchRevisiting a previous questionOK, so we've had this question before:Aside from the sites that are intrinsically visual (photo editing, for instance), how many have discarded accessibility in the name of a "rich experience?"G.ho.stGreat comments - the progess in...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 16:55:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+silverlight.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Silverlight]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/rich+internet+application.html"><![CDATA[rich Internet application]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/pc+world.html"><![CDATA[PC World]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Rich Internet Applications make big splash on PCWorld's top 25 sites to watch]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/Stewart/?p=422]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[It looks like PCWorld thinks Rich Internet Applications RIAs are going to be a big thing to watch this year because their list of the Top 25 sites to watch has a few recognizable names. The first is Popfly, Microsoft's mashup creator that is targeted at geeks and average users...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 16:47:54 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/silverlight.html"><![CDATA[Silverlight]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/rich+media.html"><![CDATA[Rich Media]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/goowy.html"><![CDATA[Goowy]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/flex.html"><![CDATA[Flex]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/flash.html"><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[PC World names BlackBerry 8800 fifth best product of 2007]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12692-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=34056&messageID=625893&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[PC World names BlackBerry 8800 fifth best product of 2007Why should I care it has no camera?  Gimme a touchscreen and WM5 anyday.A full SD card as well; not a limiting MicroSD card.The built-in cameras are by and large garbage in the first place.The keys and trackmouse could be...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 06:22:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/handhelds.html"><![CDATA[Handhelds]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/blackberry+8800.html"><![CDATA[BlackBerry 8800]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/pc+world.html"><![CDATA[PC World]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/rim+blackberry.html"><![CDATA[RIM BlackBerry]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/camera.html"><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[PC World names BlackBerry 8800 fifth best product of 2007]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/blackberry/?p=198]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[That's pretty lofty air.The ranking seems more complimentary than does Liane Cassavoy's review score of 80.Pros:	Great e-mail device	Includes integrated GPSCons:	Lacks a camera	Lacks consumer IM clientsDespite the "Cons," Lianne writes:The BlackBerry 8800's strengths--in particular, its battery life, excellent  e-mail handling, and built-in GPS features--outweigh its minuses. If you don't ...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 05:19:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/blackberry+8800.html"><![CDATA[BlackBerry 8800]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[PC World editor resigns over apparent ad pressure]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9595-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=33359&messageID=613067&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[PC World editor resigns over apparent ad pressureI guess I'll have to let that one expire...Once you let advertisers dictate what goes into print, the magazine becomes worthless.  I have no need for a worthless magazine.Who wants a mag that's OVER 30% advertising.......with annoying, individual ads stretching 3-4 pages,...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 05:45:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/pc+world.html"><![CDATA[PC World]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/advertisement.html"><![CDATA[advertisement]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/consumer+report.html"><![CDATA[consumer report]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/apple+inc..html"><![CDATA[Apple Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/advertiser.html"><![CDATA[advertiser]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AAPL</category>
		<category domain="tickers">AAPL</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[PC World picks Office 2007 as number one innovative product]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-11535-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=28656&messageID=534450&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[PC World picks Office 2007 as number one innovative productYup, and his tools are excellent.Just what a power user would want.For Power Usershttp://pschmid.net/office2007/ribbonx/index.phpCustomize all you want....Innovative?They never came across WordPro which had the same idea - albeit in a dialog box rather than a "ribbon" and the tools and properties...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 08:01:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/patrick.html"><![CDATA[Patrick]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+office.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Office]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ribbon.html"><![CDATA[ribbon]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+office+2007.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Office 2007]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/pc+world.html"><![CDATA[PC World]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[PC World picks Office 2007 as number one innovative product]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/Orchant/?p=301]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Not sure I agree with the number one on the list designation but I do agree with PC World that 2007 Microsoft Office system (small "s") is one of the most innovative products released sort of this year. The new Ribbon UI, live previews, theme and style galleries, Smart Art,...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 07:50:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+office.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Office]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/software.html"><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/productivity.html"><![CDATA[Productivity]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ribbon+ui.html"><![CDATA[Ribbon UI]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/number-one.html"><![CDATA[number-one]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[PC World's McCracken cracks down on Office 2007 (but still likes it)]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10741-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=27984&messageID=524979&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[PC World's McCracken cracks down on Office 2007 but still likes itNot a fan..Been using office 2007 for a couple of weeks and am constantly annoyed by the changes to the new UI.I'll be going back to Office XP (much like I went back to the Windows Classic look for...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 14:53:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+office+2007.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Office 2007]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mccracken.html"><![CDATA[McCracken]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+office.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Office]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/pc+world.html"><![CDATA[PC World]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[PC World's McCracken cracks down on Office 2007 (but still likes it)]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/Berlind/?p=203]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Ive been following some of the Office 2007 coverage coming out of PC Worlds camp... namely that of the magazines editor in chief Harry McCracken who has been filing some noteworthy comments about his ongoing usage of the latest version of Microsofts front office suite. McCracken likes Office 2007. But,...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 13:56:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+office+2007.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Office 2007]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+office.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Office]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/personal+technology.html"><![CDATA[Personal Technology]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/software+infrastructure.html"><![CDATA[Software Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/general.html"><![CDATA[General]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Browser Wars 2006 - Microsoft set to continue dominance]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/web2explorer/?p=68]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[With all this talk of web-based apps, it's easy to forget there's still a battle going on for the browser platform - upon which most of the 'Web 2.0' apps run. Firefox will be releasing its 1.5 version later this week, accompanied by a marketing campaign to convince users of...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2005 11:32:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/web+browser.html"><![CDATA[Web browser]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+internet+explorer.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mozilla+firefox.html"><![CDATA[Mozilla Firefox]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
