<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[patent infringement Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/patent+infringement.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to patent infringement]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="8" found="8" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Court reverses Microsoft patent-infringement ruling ]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9595-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=69777&messageID=1335394&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe there is hope for the patent system yet.Just hope is all.But....We ALL know they were bribed.... Lol.Since when was MS's  activation technology taken to court? They're sued for anything nowadays it seems like. Milking the cash cow I presume?The patent system is fineOn the whole, the patent system...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 04:41:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/linux.html"><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/patent.html"><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/patent+system.html"><![CDATA[patent system]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/patent+infringement.html"><![CDATA[patent infringement]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/unix.html"><![CDATA[Unix]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/software.html"><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Tit for tat: TomTom sues Microsoft for patent infringement]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12558-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=62286&messageID=1147532&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Tit for tat: TomTom sues Microsoft for patent infringementTit for tat: TomTom sues Microsoft for patent infringementTomTom just signed its own death warrant.  It was nice knowing you.  This is one of the dumbest moves I have ever seen any company make.  Those of you with the...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 19:03:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/tomtom.html"><![CDATA[TomTom]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/tit-for-tat.html"><![CDATA[Tit-for-Tat]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/patent+infringement.html"><![CDATA[patent infringement]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[McAfee fined $18 million for patent infringement]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10532-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=49957&messageID=936268&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[McAfee fined $18 million for patent infringementPatent for?"Method for detective intrusive agents"???You gotta love the busted US Patent system. (not; unless you're a lawyer; Shakespeare was right)-MPS: I'm sure someone has a patent on toilet paper.RE: McAfee fined $18 million for patent infringementDownload DeepNine's patent in PDF for free at...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 18:27:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/patent.html"><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/patent+infringement.html"><![CDATA[patent infringement]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mcafee+inc..html"><![CDATA[McAfee Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MFE</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MFE</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Seagate files suit against STEC for SSD patent infringement]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12554-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=46638&messageID=865679&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Seagate files suit against STEC for SSD patent infringementOK ?>>As Watkins says, this isn't about money. Companies have spent a substantial amount of money on SSD R&D and Seagate is not looking for acknowledgement and cross-licensing opportunities to reduce future R&D costs. This not only makes sense for the bottom...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 15:03:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/research+%2526+development.html"><![CDATA[Research & Development]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/stec.html"><![CDATA[STEC]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ssd.html"><![CDATA[SSD]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/seagate+technology+llc.html"><![CDATA[Seagate Technology LLC]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/r%2526d.html"><![CDATA[R&D]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">STX</category>
		<category domain="tickers">STX</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Nerac Case Study: Cellular Bioengineering Inc.]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://whitepapers.zdnet.com/abstract.aspx?docid=971725]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[In order for CBI to make strategic go-forward decisions on its Neural Matrix Chip technology, Mr. Chinn and his colleagues required critical research relating to its intellectual property development, competitors and possible future uses for the technology itself. Make the wrong decision, and the company ran the risk of patent...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Case studies]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/patent+infringement.html"><![CDATA[Patent Infringement]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/decision.html"><![CDATA[Decision]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/nerac.html"><![CDATA[Nerac]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intellectual+property.html"><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/research+%2526+development.html"><![CDATA[Research & Development]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/business+operations.html"><![CDATA[Business Operations]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[House passes patent reform, as White House voices objections]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://government.zdnet.com/?p=3391]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[The House of Representatives handed the technology industry a big win by passing the Patent Reform Act. The bill changes the way damages for patent infringement are calculated, InfoWorld reports.  Under the current scheme, damages are calculated based on the value of the entire product containing the infringing invention....]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 19:44:04 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/damage.html"><![CDATA[Damage]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/patent.html"><![CDATA[Patent]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/patent+infringement.html"><![CDATA[Patent Infringement]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/white+house.html"><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mp3.html"><![CDATA[MP3]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/zdnet+government.html"><![CDATA[ZDNet Government]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[The Microsoft-Linux patent deals]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-11202-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=34797&messageID=639585&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[The Microsoft-Linux patent dealsLethbridge has a restuarant?I thought it only had a railway bridge!As for that image - I never participate in Rorshach tests!Who to sue?If there ever WAS a patent infringement suit against Linux - just who would you sue? Talk about Whack-A-Mole! Sue a Linux distro, have it...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 04:42:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[OPEN SOURCE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/unix.html"><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/lethbridge.html"><![CDATA[Lethbridge]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/linux.html"><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/patent+infringement.html"><![CDATA[patent infringement]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hobbyist+software.html"><![CDATA[hobbyist software]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/software.html"><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Microsoft inks more Novell-like patent-infringement deals]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=402]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[I asked readers a few months ago which Linux vendor would be next to ink a patent-protection deal with Microsoft similar to the one Novell inked last November.   It turns out it wasnt any of the usual suspects. Instead, both Fuji Xerox -- and now Samsung -- quietly...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 07:20:30 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/linux.html"><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/legal.html"><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/novell.html"><![CDATA[Novell]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/corporate+strategy.html"><![CDATA[Corporate strategy]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
