<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[patent and vonage Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/patent+and+vonage.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to patent and vonage]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="5" found="5" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Vonage-Verizon patent infringement hearing today: but no decision yet]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/ip-telephony/?p=1849]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Colleague Anne Broache reports that a federal appeals court weighing the patent case that Verizon filed against  Vonage heard arguments earlier today but did not immediately reach a  decision.Anne thinks that one hint about what the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit may be  thinking...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 13:27:45 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vonage.html"><![CDATA[Vonage]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/verizon.html"><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/regulatory.html"><![CDATA[Regulatory]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/news.html"><![CDATA[News]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Vonage: we want a do-over in Verizon patent infringement trial]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/ip-telephony/?p=1581]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Vonage has asked the U.S. Appeals Court for the Federal Circuit to shelve its Verizon patent infringement judgement and send the case back to a lower court for retrial.The impetus: a unanimous opinion released by the Supreme Court on Monday, seen by some as a rework of Patent infringement law....]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 10:08:32 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vonage.html"><![CDATA[Vonage]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/verizon.html"><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/patents.html"><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/general.html"><![CDATA[General]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Could this 3Com patent be a solution to Vonage's infringement woes?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/ip-telephony/?p=1548]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[ Fellow blogger Andy Abramson writes that Ken Rutkowski, with whom he co-hosts the World Technology RoundUp has just forwarded him an email from an engineer who is listed as one of the three inventors of a 3Com patent that covers much if not most of the same ground one...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 12:31:34 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vonage.html"><![CDATA[Vonage]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/regulatory.html"><![CDATA[Regulatory]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/general.html"><![CDATA[General]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[A quick and easy guide to the Verizon patents in the Vonage case]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/ip-telephony/?p=1529]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this week I posted a detailed synopsis of the three Verizon patents at the heart of the infringement dispute with Vonage. You can find those posts here, here, and here.Network Worlds Denise Pappalardo now offers a cogent summary of just what exactly the disputed Verizon patents at the heart...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 09:12:06 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/general.html"><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vonage.html"><![CDATA[Vonage]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/verizon+voicewing.html"><![CDATA[Verizon VoiceWing]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Jury to Vonage: pay Verizon $58 million. What do you think?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/ip-telephony/?p=1470]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[A Federal jury today ordered Vonage to pay Verizon $58 million for patent infringement. The jury found that Vonage had infringed on three of the five patents Verizon accused its rival of doing.The payment, which will be appealed, is exactly one-thirds that of the $197 million Verizon had requested. The...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:11:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/verizon+voicewing.html"><![CDATA[Verizon VoiceWing]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/news.html"><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vonage.html"><![CDATA[Vonage]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/general.html"><![CDATA[General]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
