<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[palm gets Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/palm+gets.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to palm gets]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="2" found="2" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Palm gets two top Javascript developers from Mozilla]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-17927-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=69612&messageID=1331867&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmm...I don't think so![i]webOS is build on Javascript.[/i]Haven't IMB and M$ flopped with their respective Java OS and .net OS yet?Using interpreted languages for common OS functions is a no go, especially when the resources are scarce.]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:11:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/scripting+languages.html"><![CDATA[Scripting languages]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+system.html"><![CDATA[operating system]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/javascript.html"><![CDATA[JavaScript]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/palm+inc..html"><![CDATA[Palm Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mozilla+corp..html"><![CDATA[Mozilla Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">PALM</category>
		<category domain="tickers">PALM</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Palm gets personal, Apple & RIM don't]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-17932-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=66198&messageID=1246041&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Palm gets personal, Apple & RIM don'tThey just lost a customerNo way I'm buying a Pre now.Why does Palm need that information?It's just really queer when RIM & Apple manage to do very well without it.  Is it more than just a lawyer being overprotective? RE: Most Stupid Article...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 09:16:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/advertising+%2526+promotion.html"><![CDATA[Advertising & Promotion]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/handhelds.html"><![CDATA[Handhelds]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cellular+phones.html"><![CDATA[Cellular phones]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/palm+inc..html"><![CDATA[Palm Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/research+in+motion+ltd..html"><![CDATA[Research In Motion Ltd.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/apple+inc..html"><![CDATA[Apple Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/palm+gets.html"><![CDATA[Palm Gets]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AAPL</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">PALM</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">RIMM</category>
		<category domain="tickers">AAPL,PALM,RIMM</category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
