<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[osi Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/osi.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to osi]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="20" found="64" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Introduction to Information Technology]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://whitepapers.zdnet.com/abstract.aspx?docid=973163]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[View Available Dates and LocationsIn this introductory course, you will learn the basics of computers,  operating systems, and communication. With the help of interactive exercises,  you will learn about common network protocols, the use of addressing to  communicate over the network, and the role of the OSI...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Training]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/osi.html"><![CDATA[OSI]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network.html"><![CDATA[Network]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/information+technology.html"><![CDATA[Information Technology]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/networking.html"><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/wireless+and+mobility.html"><![CDATA[Wireless And Mobility]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Europe gets its own GPL]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=3768]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Europe now has its own version of the GPL.    It's got copyleft, but it lacks the extra language found in GPLv3 meant to enforce that concept.    The European Union Public LicenseÂ is an effort by EU government services to codify a Euro-centric view of copyleft,...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 10:23:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/gpl.html"><![CDATA[GPL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/osi.html"><![CDATA[OSI]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/license.html"><![CDATA[License]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/european+union+public+license.html"><![CDATA[European Union Public License]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/eupl.html"><![CDATA[EUPL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/dana+blankenhorn.html"><![CDATA[Dana Blankenhorn]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Explaining the buzzwords which students will need to know]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-17923-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=53865&messageID=1018998&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Explaining the buzzwords which students will need to knowNice WordsBut,... "Internet has the OSI model", dear, Internet runs on TCP/IP model, OSI is just a framework used nowadays to teach kids.]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 21:54:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/internet.html"><![CDATA[INTERNET]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/buzzword.html"><![CDATA[buzzword]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[It's official: OOXML is a standard]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-11155-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=50912&messageID=956116&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[It's official: OOXML is a standardA right decisionYou can only FUD so much.Now......we get to see who's going to implement it and how much of it will be implemented.  Note that if multiple vendors are using the same MS-Windows API to support OOXML, they're not creating independent implementations of...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 14:52:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/opendocument+format+%2528odf%2529.html"><![CDATA[OpenDocument Format (ODF)]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/fast+tracking.html"><![CDATA[Fast Tracking]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/office+open+xml.html"><![CDATA[Office Open XML]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/oxml.html"><![CDATA[oXML]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/osi.html"><![CDATA[OSI]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Microsoft steps up self-policing of its OSI-approved source licenses]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=1471]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[After pulling its "Sandcastle" documentation compiler from its CodePlex repository site for failure to comply with Open Source Initiative terms and conditions, Microsoft is ready to try releasing "Sandcastle" again under one of its OSI-approved licenses. by Mary Jo Foley]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 12:30:10 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/team.html"><![CDATA[Team]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/osi.html"><![CDATA[OSI]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/source+code.html"><![CDATA[Source Code]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/sandcastle.html"><![CDATA[Sandcastle]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/codeplex.html"><![CDATA[CodePlex]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/team+management.html"><![CDATA[Team Management]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/management.html"><![CDATA[Management]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mary+jo+foley.html"><![CDATA[Mary Jo Foley]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Microsoft apologizes to Open Source Initiative for policy violation]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=1433]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[After outcry from various constituencies over the past couple of days, Microsoft has pulled from its CodePlex site its Sandcastle project for failure to comply with the terms and conditions required in order to be qualify as bona-fide open source.    Sandcastle is a documentation compiler for managed...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 13:08:34 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/osi.html"><![CDATA[OSI]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source+initiative.html"><![CDATA[Open Source Initiative]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/sandcastle.html"><![CDATA[Sandcastle]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mary+jo+foley.html"><![CDATA[Mary Jo Foley]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Bruce is back, does OSI still want him?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10535-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=45776&messageID=844957&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Bruce is back, does OSI still want him?Bruce, Bruce, Bruce...Personally, I think Perens is a has been.  He wants a seat on the OSI board to try to become relevant again.His "campaign" seems to be based on fear-mongering.  He writes "I think that vendor-domination of Open Source inevitably...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 06:58:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/corporate+governance.html"><![CDATA[Corporate governance]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/osi.html"><![CDATA[OSI]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/board.html"><![CDATA[board]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Bruce is back, does OSI still want him?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=2150]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Open Source Initiative co-founder Bruce Perens wants back on the board.    Perens, who quit OSI in 1999 to concentrate on free software, has launched a petition drive to win his way back in.    Perens says vendors are over-represented on the board, which is headed...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 06:10:55 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/osi.html"><![CDATA[OSI]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/bruce+perens.html"><![CDATA[Bruce Perens]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/bruce.html"><![CDATA[Bruce]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/michael+tiemann.html"><![CDATA[Michael Tiemann]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/dana+blankenhorn.html"><![CDATA[Dana Blankenhorn]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Will the GPL be overtaken by AGPL?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=2133]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Version 3 of the Affero GPL was approved by the OSI last week, leading one of its advocates to suggest it should become the most popular version over time. (Picture from last October's VentureCamp for Blognation.)    As the software industry increasingly moves to a Software as a...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 06:15:55 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/software.html"><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/gpl.html"><![CDATA[GPL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/osi.html"><![CDATA[OSI]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/loophole.html"><![CDATA[Loophole]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/capobianco.html"><![CDATA[Capobianco]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/tools+%2526+techniques.html"><![CDATA[Tools & Techniques]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/management.html"><![CDATA[Management]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/dana+blankenhorn.html"><![CDATA[Dana Blankenhorn]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[OSI Model Screensaver 1.0 (Windows)]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://downloads.zdnet.com/abstract.aspx?docid=620815]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[We design special screensavers and wall-papers for IT/Networking professionals and students, who will display our art on their computer screens for months or years. Screensavers are widely displayed on people&apos;s PCs for months, even years. Marketing messages, product names and corporate logos and active links to your websites can be...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Software downloads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/osi.html"><![CDATA[OSI]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/screensaver.html"><![CDATA[Screensaver]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/javvin.html"><![CDATA[Javvin]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[OpenDocument Foundation's 'woes' have little to do with OpenDoc Format's future]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10741-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=41098&messageID=760491&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[OpenDocument Foundation's 'woes' have little to do with OpenDoc Format's futureThere will never be a shortageof those who oppose freedom and support the rich and powerful. Will they be able to fool all the people, all the time?Never! There will always be at least one holdout........ Me!Good summation.This OD Foundation...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 12:12:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/opendocument+format+%2528odf%2529.html"><![CDATA[OpenDocument Format (ODF)]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/opendocument+format.html"><![CDATA[OpenDocument Format]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ooxml.html"><![CDATA[OOXML]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/osi.html"><![CDATA[OSI]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/james+thurber.html"><![CDATA[James Thurber]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/opendoc+format.html"><![CDATA[OpenDoc Format]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/opendocument+foundation.html"><![CDATA[OpenDocument Foundation]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/opendoc.html"><![CDATA[OpenDoc]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[News to know: Yahoo; Enterprise mashups; Ubuntu; Intel; IBM]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=6635]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Notable headlines:    Dion Hinchcliffe: The 10 top challenges facing enterprise mashups. Dave Greenfield: Top 100 Enterprise 2.0 Links. Dan Farber: Coming up: Web 2.0 Summit    Garett Rogers: Google Apps Gmail now uses the Gmail storage counter.    Adrian Kingsley-Hughes: Looking forward to...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 02:14:31 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ubuntu.html"><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/osi.html"><![CDATA[OSI]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/larry+dignan.html"><![CDATA[Larry Dignan]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/yahoo%2521+inc..html"><![CDATA[Yahoo! Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/symbian+inc..html"><![CDATA[Symbian Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ibm+corp..html"><![CDATA[IBM Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mashup.html"><![CDATA[Mashup]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/routers+%2526+switches.html"><![CDATA[Routers & Switches]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/web+2.0.html"><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/networking.html"><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/internet.html"><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/larry+dignan.html"><![CDATA[Larry Dignan]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">IBM</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">YHOO</category>
		<category domain="tickers">IBM,INTC,YHOO</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Was OSI right to let Microsoft licenses in?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10535-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=39948&messageID=735758&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Was OSI right to let Microsoft licenses in?I voted "Ok, but I wouldn't use them"I voted "Ok, but I wouldn't use them" because there's already a whole spectrum of open source licenses to choose from(GPL, MIT, BSD, MPL, etc). That's not to say I wouldn't use Ms-PL or Ms-RL licensed...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 21:32:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[OPEN SOURCE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+licenses.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Licenses]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/osi.html"><![CDATA[OSI]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Was OSI right to let Microsoft licenses in?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=1557]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Was the Open Source Initiative right to approve two Microsoft licensesÂ today?    The two licenses, the Microsoft Public License and the Microsoft Recipricol License, both read like baby steps down the open source incline. The first says a patent suit invalidates the license. The second also requires that...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 20:16:35 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/osi.html"><![CDATA[OSI]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/dana+blankenhorn.html"><![CDATA[Dana Blankenhorn]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Microsoft gets the open-source licensing nod from the OSI]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12558-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=39943&messageID=735344&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft gets the open-source licensing nod from the OSIOh mah gosh!Hell just froze over! ]:)It gets better for users and coders everyday.Keep up the good efforts Microsoft!wait and seeLet's not get too excited. Just because they hammered out the terms for two licenses doesn't mean that they will release anything...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 11:50:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/tools+%2526+techniques.html"><![CDATA[Tools & Techniques]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/.net.html"><![CDATA[.NET]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/shared+source.html"><![CDATA[Shared Source]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/impartiality.html"><![CDATA[Impartiality]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/osi.html"><![CDATA[OSI]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/software.html"><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+.net.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft .NET]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Microsoft gets the open-source licensing nod from the OSI]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=835]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft was awarded an official Open Source Initiative OSI approval for the two Shared Source licenses it submitted for consideration in August -- but not without agreeing to some OSI-requested changes first.    On October 16, Microsoft officials announced that the Microsoft Permissive License (MS-PL) -- which is...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 10:57:18 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/osi.html"><![CDATA[OSI]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source+initiative.html"><![CDATA[Open Source Initiative]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mary+jo+foley.html"><![CDATA[Mary Jo Foley]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Why SugarCRM made peace]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=1361]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[SugarCRM's summertime peace deal with OSI was motivated by marketing considerations.This became clear to me reading CEO John Roberts' hype concerning his latest release, Sugar 5.0. It's all about the Internet, about push vs. pull, about the glories of the open source business model.Not that there's anything wrong with that....]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:13:26 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/osi.html"><![CDATA[OSI]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/sugarcrm.html"><![CDATA[SugarCRM]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/dana+blankenhorn.html"><![CDATA[Dana Blankenhorn]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Microsoft Shared Source licenses are now in OSI's hands]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12558-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=37336&messageID=686099&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft Shared Source licenses are now in OSI's handsthe OSS must take actionand speak up against the M$ dirty deeds.A good ideea could be to picket the OSI office to reject these M$ 'creations'.once a shill always a shillIs there anythin about microsft MJF that isnt good.  S squared...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 11:47:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+shared+source+license.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Shared Source license]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/osi.html"><![CDATA[OSI]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/standards.html"><![CDATA[standards]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Microsoft Shared Source licenses are now in OSI's hands]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=638]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[On August 9, Microsoft made good on its promise to submit its Shared Source licenses to the Open Source Initiative for consideration as certified open-source licenses.Microsoft submitted two of its three Shared Source licenses for consideration: The Microsoft Permissive License (MS-PL) and Microsoft Community License (MS-CL). It did not submit...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 09:44:31 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/osi.html"><![CDATA[OSI]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mary+jo+foley.html"><![CDATA[Mary Jo Foley]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Will Microsoft fit into OSI compromise?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10535-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=36791&messageID=676798&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Will Microsoft fit into OSI compromise?GPL is the only true open source licenseall other licenses are just a relic of an unfortunate and dark era.Compromise, yes. But surrender, no...As I have said before, while it's likely some of the Microsoft licenses will pass the open source sniff test with ease,...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 07:30:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/gpl.html"><![CDATA[GPL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/osi.html"><![CDATA[OSI]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
