<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[os model Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/os+model.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to os model]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="1" found="1" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[The layered approach ... my wish for a future OS]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12554-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=51071&messageID=958957&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[The layered approach ... my wish for a future OSSounds a lot like BSD to me....BSD (and therefore Mac OS/X) has much the same structure as the one you describe. Indeed this structure has some inherent advantages.However, in practice BSD doesn't have a stability or reliability advantage over Linux. Linux...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:21:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/unix.html"><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/os+model.html"><![CDATA[OS Model]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+system.html"><![CDATA[operating system]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/bsd.html"><![CDATA[BSD]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
