<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[openbsd Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/openbsd.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to openbsd]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="20" found="25" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[What the DoD now says about open source]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10535-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=70965&messageID=1365524&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[I could just see a commander in the field ....having to wait for procurement to get a simple map through bids while his troops are getting shot up even though it is publicly available (oh wait, isn't that how the Chinese embassy got accidentally bombed?)Always use the best tool for...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 05:41:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/linux.html"><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/unix.html"><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cyberthreats.html"><![CDATA[Cyberthreats]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/security.html"><![CDATA[SECURITY]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/spyware%252c+adware+%2526+malware.html"><![CDATA[Spyware, adware & malware]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/u.s.+department+of+defense.html"><![CDATA[U.S. Department of Defense]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/openbsd.html"><![CDATA[OpenBSD]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/attack.html"><![CDATA[attack]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Torvalds attacks IT industry 'security circus']]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9595-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=49853&messageID=933575&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Torvalds attacks IT industry 'security circus'Torvalds attacks IT industry 'security circus'So Linus admits that there are security flaws in linux as well as other bugs?  I've been saying that for a long time but the fanboys wouldn't believe me.  Now that their leader finally admits to it perhaps...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 07:32:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/unix.html"><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[OPEN SOURCE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/l.d..html"><![CDATA[L.D.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/name-calling.html"><![CDATA[Name-calling]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/linus.html"><![CDATA[Linus]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/torvalds.html"><![CDATA[Torvalds]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/security.html"><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/attack.html"><![CDATA[attack]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/it+industry.html"><![CDATA[IT industry]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/openbsd.html"><![CDATA[OpenBSD]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Apple plugs 25 Mac OS X security vulnerabilities]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12691-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=49245&messageID=921256&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple plugs 25 Mac OS X security vulnerabilitiesAnother 25?Wow, how come people are finding so many holes in OS X? Has anything changed? There never used to be so many security vulnerabilities in OS X or could it simply be that they've [b]always[/b] been there and they've simply never been...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:57:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/unix.html"><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/osx.html"><![CDATA[OSX]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/apple+mac+os+x.html"><![CDATA[Apple Mac OS X]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mac+os+x+security+vulnerability.html"><![CDATA[Mac OS X security vulnerability]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mac+os+x+security.html"><![CDATA[Mac OS X security]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/bsd.html"><![CDATA[BSD]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/apple+inc..html"><![CDATA[Apple Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/apple+mac+os.html"><![CDATA[Apple Mac OS]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vulnerability.html"><![CDATA[vulnerability]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/apple+macintosh.html"><![CDATA[Apple Macintosh]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/security.html"><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AAPL</category>
		<category domain="tickers">AAPL</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Red Hat takes the open source security challenge]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10535-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=45821&messageID=845631&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Red Hat takes the open source security challengeSilly MeAnd here I always assume that if it's closed it's insecure.Open Source = the possibility for peer review.Security: Obscurity or Design?This has been discussed [i]ad nauseam[/i] with the "security through obscurity" versus the "security by design" model. This all goes back to...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 06:47:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/unix.html"><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/red+hat+inc..html"><![CDATA[Red Hat Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/security.html"><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/openbsd.html"><![CDATA[OpenBSD]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">RHT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">RHT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Mixing GPL and BSD code just takes care]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10535-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=39286&messageID=721804&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Mixing GPL and BSD code just takes careWho's stealing what?Before De Raadt compains about GPL boys "stealing" code, he better review his license. Don't proprietary companies "steal" BSD code when they make proprietary programs from BSD code? If that's allowed by the license, then why are the GPL people to...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 07:43:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/unix.html"><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[OPEN SOURCE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/de+raadt.html"><![CDATA[De Raadt]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/bsd+code.html"><![CDATA[BSD Code]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/bsd.html"><![CDATA[BSD]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/madwifi.html"><![CDATA[MADWiFi]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/madwifi+developer.html"><![CDATA[Madwifi developer]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/openbsd.html"><![CDATA[OpenBSD]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/gpl.html"><![CDATA[GPL]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Mixing GPL and BSD code just takes care]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=1476]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[The Software Freedom Law Center has released a set of guidelines for projects that need to mix BSD and GPL code.    This follows a highly-publicized dispute over Atheros driver code for the Linux kernel, during which OpenBSD head Theo de Raadt and other OpenBSD leaders got, shall...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 06:48:29 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/developer.html"><![CDATA[Developer]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/gpl.html"><![CDATA[GPL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/openbsd.html"><![CDATA[OpenBSD]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/bsd.html"><![CDATA[BSD]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/software+freedom+law+center.html"><![CDATA[Software Freedom Law Center]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/raadt.html"><![CDATA[Raadt]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/unix.html"><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating Systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/software.html"><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/dana+blankenhorn.html"><![CDATA[Dana Blankenhorn]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[OpenBSD team mocked at first ever 'Pwnie' awards]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12691-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=36941&messageID=678634&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[OpenBSD team mocked at first ever 'Pwnie' awardsDavid Maynor definitely deserves a JeerHe has to be one of the most unprofessional bug hunters.Re: Maynor's bugI wonder when we'll get a comment from Mr. Ou regarding this one.Maynor's BugIt seems to me that the problem was that the judges here are...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 10:44:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/security.html"><![CDATA[SECURITY]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/unix.html"><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/team.html"><![CDATA[team]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/openbsd.html"><![CDATA[OpenBSD]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/apple+inc..html"><![CDATA[Apple Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/david+maynor.html"><![CDATA[David Maynor]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/pwnie.html"><![CDATA[Pwnie]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/maynor.html"><![CDATA[Maynor]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vulnerability.html"><![CDATA[vulnerability]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AAPL</category>
		<category domain="tickers">AAPL</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[OpenBSD team mocked at first ever 'Pwnie' awards]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=418]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[LAS VEGAS -- The OpenBSD team has won an award for the most spectacular "mishandling" of a critical security vulnerability.Here's why:The OpenBSD team refused to acknowledge the bug as a security 		vulnerability and issued a "reliability fix" for it. A week later Core 		Security had developed proof of concept code...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 10:19:43 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/zero-day+attacks.html"><![CDATA[Zero-day attacks]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/wireless.html"><![CDATA[Wireless]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windows+vista.html"><![CDATA[Windows Vista]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/wi-fi+security.html"><![CDATA[Wi-Fi security]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vulnerability+research.html"><![CDATA[Vulnerability research]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/viruses+and+worms.html"><![CDATA[Viruses and Worms]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/responsible+disclosure.html"><![CDATA[Responsible disclosure]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/pen+testing.html"><![CDATA[Pen testing]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/patch+watch.html"><![CDATA[Patch Watch]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mozilla.html"><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hackers.html"><![CDATA[Hackers]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/google.html"><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/firefox.html"><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/exploit+code.html"><![CDATA[Exploit code]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/data+theft.html"><![CDATA[Data theft]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/browsers.html"><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/botnets.html"><![CDATA[Botnets]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/apple.html"><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Linus contradicts OpenBSD founder on Intel TLB issue]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10533-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=35646&messageID=656539&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Linus contradicts OpenBSD founder on Intel TLB issueIntel's viewI am from Intel, and I thought I would give you our perspective. Months ago, we addressed a processor issue by providing a BIOS update for our customers that in no way affects system performance. We publicly documented this as an erratum...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 10:21:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/unix.html"><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[OPEN SOURCE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/linus.html"><![CDATA[Linus]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+tlb.html"><![CDATA[Intel TLB]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/openbsd.html"><![CDATA[OpenBSD]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processor.html"><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="tickers">INTC</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Linus contradicts OpenBSD founder on Intel TLB issue]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/?p=559]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[OpenBSD founder Theo de Raadt has been making a lot of noise over a change in Intel's current generation Core 2 microprocessor goes as far to claim that this will lead to serious security flaws.  Linus Torvalds by contrast has given a completely opposite view of the situation while...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 10:08:16 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/servers.html"><![CDATA[Servers]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/security.html"><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/news.html"><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/linux.html"><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel.html"><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hardware.html"><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/desktop.html"><![CDATA[Desktop]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/amd.html"><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[OpenBSD founder: Intel leaves open-source out in the cold]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12691-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=35611&messageID=655658&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[OpenBSD founder: Intel leaves open-source out in the coldMust be the competitionBecause of the drastic changes in the processors over the last couple of years, more flaws in the design are probably more likely to show up.  Still, this is an issue that should be addressed.  Especially on...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 11:57:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/unix.html"><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processor.html"><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/openbsd.html"><![CDATA[OpenBSD]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cold+calling.html"><![CDATA[cold calling]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="tickers">INTC</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[OpenBSD founder: Intel leaves open-source out in the cold]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=336]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[OpenBSD founder Theo de Raadt wants Intel to come clean on the severity of bugs in the Intel Core 2 processors, warning that some of the bugs "will *ASSUREDLY* be exploitable from userland code."de Raadt's comments follow Intel's release of a BIOS patch to cover potential unpredictable system behavior on...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 11:06:18 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/botnets.html"><![CDATA[Botnets]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/browsers.html"><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/data+theft.html"><![CDATA[Data theft]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/exploit+code.html"><![CDATA[Exploit code]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hackers.html"><![CDATA[Hackers]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/metasploit.html"><![CDATA[Metasploit]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[Open source]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/patch+watch.html"><![CDATA[Patch Watch]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/pen+testing.html"><![CDATA[Pen testing]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/punditocracy.html"><![CDATA[Punditocracy]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/responsible+disclosure.html"><![CDATA[Responsible disclosure]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vulnerability+research.html"><![CDATA[Vulnerability research]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Is Java the missing lever in comparing Windows to OpenBSD?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-11202-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=32627&messageID=600627&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Is Java the missing lever in comparing Windows to OpenBSD?Java Community ProcessSun invented its own standards body.http://jcp.org/en/home/indexIBM.There was a reason IBM pushed for opening java, in addition to saving on licensing fees.  Whatever restriction the community process may have placed on IBM's direction with Java has now been loosened...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 00:59:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/programming+languages.html"><![CDATA[Programming languages]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/unix.html"><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[OPEN SOURCE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/win4bsd.html"><![CDATA[Win4BSD]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/java.html"><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/bsd.html"><![CDATA[BSD]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/l-unix+link.html"><![CDATA[L-unix Link]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/openbsd.html"><![CDATA[OpenBSD]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/sun+microsystems+inc..html"><![CDATA[Sun Microsystems Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ibm+corp..html"><![CDATA[IBM Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">IBM</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">JAVA</category>
		<category domain="tickers">IBM,JAVA</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Is Java the missing lever in comparing Windows to OpenBSD?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/Murphy/?p=840]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[  In thinking more about the business of ranking one OS as better than another Ive reached  an odd conclusion: specifically, that its perfectly reasonable to do this with respect to  any set of business conditions as long as the evaluation is limited to factors affecting ...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 00:15:33 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vistabulations.html"><![CDATA[Vistabulations]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/general.html"><![CDATA[General]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[x86 Security]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/Murphy/?p=836]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[I, ah, blush to admit this - but when last weeks revelations about the Windows  .ANI cursor hole appeared, I thought someone was pulling an April fools joke. Apparently  not, but the mess led me to wonder just how something like this could  happen.   ...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 00:15:52 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/general.html"><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vistabulations.html"><![CDATA[Vistabulations]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/security.html"><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/enterprise+policy.html"><![CDATA[Enterprise Policy]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[OpenBSD hit by 'critical' IPv6 flaw]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-1009-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=31318&messageID=579605&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[OpenBSD hit by 'critical' IPv6 flawIt still isYou can still make that claim.  Remember, "Only two remote holes in the default install, in more than 10 years!"   That still makes for a very good arguement of being one of the most secure operating systems.My faultI posted on...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 12:51:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/unix.html"><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[OPEN SOURCE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/networking.html"><![CDATA[NETWORKING]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/bsd.html"><![CDATA[BSD]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/openbsd.html"><![CDATA[OpenBSD]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ipv6.html"><![CDATA[IPv6]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+system.html"><![CDATA[operating system]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Open source pressure is free]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10535-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=26029&messageID=489186&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Open source pressure is freeIntel has a simple solutionHow can there be a conflict over this?  Intel wants to sell hardware and Theo wants to give away software that will run on this hardware.  Well almost, the OpenBSD team would like to sell CDs at $50.  There...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 06:33:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/unix.html"><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/openbsd.html"><![CDATA[OpenBSD]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/theo.html"><![CDATA[Theo]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hardware.html"><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="tickers">INTC</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Secure open source at least a year away]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10535-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=20633&messageID=394857&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Secure open source at least a year awayFlaw in X Window SystemDear Sirs!1. It is called X Window, NOT X Windows!2. That "dangerous" bug was exploitable for    certain local users only. Not very serious but    never the less, the patch was suplied whitin ...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 22:08:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/unix.html"><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/openbsd.html"><![CDATA[OpenBSD]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/linux.html"><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/secure+linux.html"><![CDATA[Secure Linux]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/security.html"><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/x+window.html"><![CDATA[X Window]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/x+window+system.html"><![CDATA[X Window System]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[OpenBSD update promises better protection]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-3513-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=20588&messageID=394418&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[OpenBSD update promises better protectionCome on people, OpenBSD is a great distribution, and Linux benifits fromthem as well. Give a hand to preserve the diversity. This is also the most secure open source OS, actually probably the most secure of all including comercial.OpenBSD update promises better protectionAnd I was starting...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 12:26:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/unix.html"><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[OPEN SOURCE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/openbsd.html"><![CDATA[OpenBSD]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/linux.html"><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/bsd.html"><![CDATA[BSD]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ibm+corp..html"><![CDATA[IBM Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">IBM</category>
		<category domain="tickers">IBM</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Choosing America]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/Murphy/?p=553]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Politics has no business in business proposals, right? Exactly what I said  when I ran into this sentence fragment:    the abolition of personal freedom in the US under the Patriot act   in part of a business plan discussing the company's decision to put their...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 03:32:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/sun+solaris.html"><![CDATA[Sun Solaris]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/openbsd.html"><![CDATA[openBSD]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
