<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[open source license Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source+license.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to open source license]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="6" found="6" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[How much legal trouble is Cisco in against the FSF?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10535-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=62994&messageID=1164338&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[How much legal trouble is Cisco in against the FSF?damm that open source creeping!I guess this means that cisco doesnt employ strict version control and monitor what goes into their products?I guess that would mean they make good products but dont actually know whats in them and therefore could be...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 10:16:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cisco+systems+inc..html"><![CDATA[Cisco Systems Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source+license.html"><![CDATA[open source license]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/free+software+foundation.html"><![CDATA[Free Software Foundation]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">CSCO</category>
		<category domain="tickers">CSCO</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Open source licenses are valid]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=2783]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[When you break the terms of an open source license you are committing a copyright violation. Creative Commons has the same power under law that the record or movie industries do. by Dana Blankenhorn]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 06:05:31 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source+license.html"><![CDATA[Open Source License]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/dana+blankenhorn.html"><![CDATA[Dana Blankenhorn]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[How much do open source license terms matter?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=1354]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[A lot of time is spent here on the differences among open source licenses.Where you stand on the open source incline, whether it's near the top with a Microsoft license, at the bottom with the GPL, or somewhere in the middle with a BSD license, is supposed to matter.But, almost...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:19:39 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/license.html"><![CDATA[License]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/dana+blankenhorn.html"><![CDATA[Dana Blankenhorn]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Intalio makes disingenuous claim that it has released code as open source]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=4124]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[I just received a press release from Intalio who is engaging in what Id consider to be more slight of hand when it comes to vendors claiming that theyve released code under an open source license when that isnt the case, at least according to the people who have written...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 09:44:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mozilla+public+license.html"><![CDATA[Mozilla Public License]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/legal.html"><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/software+infrastructure.html"><![CDATA[Software Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/general.html"><![CDATA[General]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Podcast: SugarCRM CEO says attribution in open source licenses is about fairness]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10741-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=28045&messageID=525968&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Podcast: SugarCRM CEO says attribution in open source licenses is about fairnesslicense merger defense?"SPL is nothing more than a merger of two existing open source licenses: the Mozilla Public License and the Attribution Assurance License. "If this is meant to defend SPL, it does a bad job. Merging two licenses...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 08:31:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mergers+%2526+acquisitions.html"><![CDATA[Mergers & Acquisitions]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/podcasts.html"><![CDATA[Podcasts]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source+license.html"><![CDATA[open source license]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/fairness.html"><![CDATA[fairness]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/merger.html"><![CDATA[merger]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/sugarcrm.html"><![CDATA[SugarCRM]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/podcast.html"><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Intel to stop using open source license]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9584-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=9326&messageID=186158&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Intel to stop using open source licenseDon't see it this way...I see this as Intel moving further to the Microsoft camp. By cancelling this license, Intel is moving away from Open Source towards more robust and industry standard offerings like Windows. The fact that this move coincides with the release...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2005 08:25:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/unix.html"><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+obviously.html"><![CDATA[Intel obviously]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/osi.html"><![CDATA[OSI]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source+license.html"><![CDATA[open source license]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/satire.html"><![CDATA[satire]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="tickers">INTC</category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
