<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[nortonworks Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/nortonworks.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to nortonworks]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="1" found="1" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[F-Secure issues patch for critical flaws]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-1009-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=16909&messageID=333792&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[F-Secure issues patch for critical flawsOf course this story makes me wonder...I'm just waiting now for the Linux zealots to start diving in and explaining how products designed for Linux that have security flaws got those flaws from either XP or IE. I'm not sure how they are going to...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 13:47:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/security.html"><![CDATA[SECURITY]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+xp.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows XP]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/nortonworks.html"><![CDATA[NortonWorks]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/flaw.html"><![CDATA[flaw]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/typo.html"><![CDATA[Typo]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/linux.html"><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/f-secure+corp..html"><![CDATA[F-Secure Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">FSC</category>
		<category domain="tickers">FSC</category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
