<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[new logo Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/new+logo.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to new logo]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="2" found="2" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Office 2010: new logo, Outlook, and user interface]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-17923-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=63456&messageID=1175206&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Office 2010: new logo, Outlook, and user interfaceUser Interface ChangesIt looks good, but one thing that bothers me is the removal of the "Office Orb" in the top left hand corner of the Office 2010 suite, replaced by the style used by the ribbon in Windows 7's Paint and WordPad...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 09:34:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/groupware.html"><![CDATA[Groupware]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ois.html"><![CDATA[OIS]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+office.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Office]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/office+2010.html"><![CDATA[Office 2010]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/new+logo.html"><![CDATA[new logo]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+outlook.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Outlook]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Intel's next big leap--new logos]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10532-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=16364&messageID=325131&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Intel's next big leap--new logosSo Yonah isn't superior?With the dual core Yonah's coming out, it's clear that Intel HAS produced something with top-level performance and superior power consumption.  So what hasn't turned out so well?Good PlanIt's a case of playing to your strengths.Trying to produce superior products hasn't turned...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2006 15:50:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network+technology.html"><![CDATA[Network technology]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/64-bit.html"><![CDATA[64-bit]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/yonah.html"><![CDATA[Yonah]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/new+logo.html"><![CDATA[new logo]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/makeover.html"><![CDATA[makeover]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/marketing.html"><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/advanced+micro+devices+inc..html"><![CDATA[Advanced Micro Devices Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AMD</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="tickers">AMD,INTC</category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
