<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[new internet Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/new+internet.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to new internet]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="4" found="4" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Do we need a new internet?  No, but we do need more researchers.]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12691-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=60931&messageID=1121836&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Do we need a new internet?  No, but we do need more researchers.very well statedand much agree with your point of view. There could be things put together that we already know something about, like both-ends-verified email, which would refuse spammers a sending point.I think it's possible to imagine...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:44:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/new+internet.html"><![CDATA[new Internet]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/e-mail.html"><![CDATA[e-mail]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/email+system.html"><![CDATA[email system]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/internet.html"><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[CIO Sessions: Verisign CTO on building a new Internet]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10532-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=60681&messageID=1116590&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[CIO Sessions: Verisign CTO on building a new InternetRightHas everyone forgot the wildcard redirect in DNS?  Verisign can't be trusted to design a new internet because its design would "coincidentally" lock in Verisign's incumbency and enhance Verisign's revenues.Imagine the feeding frenzy at the committee meetings with telcos, cable companies...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 06:13:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/verisign+inc..html"><![CDATA[VeriSign Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/new+internet.html"><![CDATA[new Internet]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/security.html"><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/internet.html"><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">VRSN</category>
		<category domain="tickers">VRSN</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[New Internet domains in the works]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9588-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=7021&messageID=141007&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[New Internet domains in the worksI've got a good oneHow about .xxx if you know what I mean. Hee Hee.How freaking uselessI have YET to come across ANY website that ISN'T in .com, .net, .org, .edu, and .gov. The original domain names are used the most. I see no need...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2004 21:30:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/.net.html"><![CDATA[.NET]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/new+internet.html"><![CDATA[New Internet]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/domain.html"><![CDATA[domain]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/domain+name.html"><![CDATA[domain name]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[New Internet speed record set]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-3513-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=2850&messageID=60149&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[New Internet speed record setAll the more bandwidth for...Spyware, Adware, Viruses and Junk Mail...It's a shame the bandwidth can't be put to good use.  To many low-life's in the world :(NTAnd  I'm still paying $40 a month for 384k?.RE: NTAnd I'm still paying $40 a month for 384k?Past...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2004 09:25:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network+technology.html"><![CDATA[Network technology]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/broadband+internet.html"><![CDATA[Broadband Internet]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/spyware.html"><![CDATA[Spyware]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/new+internet.html"><![CDATA[New Internet]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/bandwidth.html"><![CDATA[bandwidth]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/broadband.html"><![CDATA[broadband]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/speed+record.html"><![CDATA[speed record]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
