<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[new data breach Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/new+data+breach.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to new data breach]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="1" found="1" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Schwarzenegger terminates new data breach bill (again)]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10532-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=52661&messageID=992232&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Schwarzenegger terminates new data breach bill againInteresting predicamentOn one side the consumer should be notified of data breaches where their data is at risk, but on the other side should the consumer be notified everytime the systems is breached, even in the smallest way, one that has no effect on...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 13:48:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/security.html"><![CDATA[SECURITY]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/data+breach.html"><![CDATA[data breach]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/new+data+breach.html"><![CDATA[new data breach]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/schwarzenegger.html"><![CDATA[Schwarzenegger]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/corporate+data.html"><![CDATA[corporate data]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
