<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[network neutrality Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network+neutrality.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to network neutrality]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="17" found="17" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA["Net neutrality" is stupid]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/storage/?p=373]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Today's net neutrality tempest - Google: are they or aren't they? - is a marketing mistake with grave public policy implications. The mistake was law professor Tim Wu's: creating a new label when a perfectly good one is already there.    "Net neutrality" is another term for "common...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 06:41:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/professor.html"><![CDATA[Professor]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network.html"><![CDATA[Network]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network+neutrality.html"><![CDATA[Network Neutrality]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/federal+express.html"><![CDATA[Federal Express]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/net+neutrality.html"><![CDATA[Net Neutrality]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/carrier.html"><![CDATA[Carrier]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/networking.html"><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/robin+harris.html"><![CDATA[Robin Harris]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/robin+harris.html"><![CDATA[Robin Harris]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Google ditching network neutrality?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10532-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=55463&messageID=1048195&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Google ditching network neutrality?{sigh}I long for the day when reporters:1) Don't spew lies and misconceptions intentionally.- or -2) Learn about the technology they write about.Network neutrality isn't about disallowing a company to invest into their infrastructure to make access to their services responsive and available.  Network neutrality is about...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 19:46:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network+neutrality.html"><![CDATA[network neutrality]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/google+inc..html"><![CDATA[Google Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cable+company.html"><![CDATA[cable company]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network.html"><![CDATA[network]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cable.html"><![CDATA[cable]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/server.html"><![CDATA[server]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">GOOG</category>
		<category domain="tickers">GOOG</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Google wants own fast lane; risks Net neutrality]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/gadgetreviews/?p=633]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATE: Google's saying the WSJ got its intentions wrong. Read more about it here on Between the Lines.    In a stark reversal of the company's support of Net neutrality, Google has approached major cable and phone companies with a proposal to create a fast lane for its...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 19:26:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/google+inc..html"><![CDATA[Google Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network.html"><![CDATA[Network]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network+neutrality.html"><![CDATA[Network Neutrality]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/net+neutrality.html"><![CDATA[Net Neutrality]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/andrew+nusca.html"><![CDATA[Andrew Nusca]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/andrew+nusca.html"><![CDATA[Andrew Nusca]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">GOOG</category>
		<category domain="tickers">GOOG</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Can sites violate net neutrality?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10535-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=50999&messageID=957806&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Can sites violate net neutrality?I would say .."not exactly"This isnt the same case of outright blocking as we all know and have come to love Comcast for doing...however this is adding a perceived "added-value" to an overpriced pipe. IF the ISP decided to tier this and add in a method...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 07:08:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/networking.html"><![CDATA[NETWORKING]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/espn360.html"><![CDATA[ESPN360]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network+neutrality.html"><![CDATA[network neutrality]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network.html"><![CDATA[network]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/comcast+corp..html"><![CDATA[Comcast Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/net+neutrality.html"><![CDATA[Net Neutrality]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/internet.html"><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">CMCSA</category>
		<category domain="tickers">CMCSA</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[FCC slaps Comcast's wrist over network neutrality; Sets precedent]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10532-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=50368&messageID=945244&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[FCC slaps Comcast's wrist over network neutrality; Sets precedentif comcast is truly guiltythey should be fine and severely monitor and audit for a period of time . so they walk straight. FCC should make a example out of them  so other should fear FCC for realRE: FCC slaps Comcast's...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:02:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/federal+government.html"><![CDATA[Federal government]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/internet+service+providers+%2528isps%2529.html"><![CDATA[Internet service providers (ISPs)]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/now+here.html"><![CDATA[NOW HERE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/comcast+corp..html"><![CDATA[Comcast Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/fcc.html"><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/wrist.html"><![CDATA[wrist]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network+neutrality.html"><![CDATA[network neutrality]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/internet+service+provider.html"><![CDATA[Internet Service Provider]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network.html"><![CDATA[network]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">CMCSA</category>
		<category domain="tickers">CMCSA</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[FCC slaps Comcast's wrist over network neutrality; Sets precedent]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=9530]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[The Federal Communications Commission on Friday ruled 3-2 that Comcast overstepped its network management authority by blocking BitTorrent peer to peer traffic, but stopped short of fining the cable company. The move clarifies the boundaries a bit for other carriers and sends the message that the FCC enforces network neutrality...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 08:48:38 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/fcc.html"><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network.html"><![CDATA[Network]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/comcast+corp..html"><![CDATA[Comcast Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network+neutrality.html"><![CDATA[Network Neutrality]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network+neutrality+rule.html"><![CDATA[Network Neutrality Rule]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/deborah+taylor+tate.html"><![CDATA[Deborah Taylor Tate]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/federal+government.html"><![CDATA[Federal Government]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/networking.html"><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/government.html"><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/larry+dignan.html"><![CDATA[Larry Dignan]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">CMCSA</category>
		<category domain="tickers">CMCSA</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Network Neutrality]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10532-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=50270&messageID=943427&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Network NeutralityPlease for the love of all that is literature, proof read that.  About.....the article.  You start with the correct understanding of net neutrality, then end on a note questioning product placement fairness.You lost me.. and i am a network engineer.  Packet was mis-routed somewhere in there.Personally,...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:23:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/net+neutrality.html"><![CDATA[Net Neutrality]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network+neutrality.html"><![CDATA[network neutrality]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/google+inc..html"><![CDATA[Google Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network.html"><![CDATA[network]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">GOOG</category>
		<category domain="tickers">GOOG</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Network Neutrality & Google's Openness Before The FCC]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=9487]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Google clearly wants the FCC to make sure that other private companiesâ€™ networks are open equally to all Internet services. Now, it will be interesting to see if that applies to networks in which Google is involved.    On Friday, the Commission takes up the question of whether...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:37:56 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/fcc.html"><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/google+inc..html"><![CDATA[Google Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network.html"><![CDATA[Network]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/comcast+corp..html"><![CDATA[Comcast Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/clearwire+corp..html"><![CDATA[Clearwire Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network+neutrality.html"><![CDATA[Network Neutrality]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/internet.html"><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/federal+government.html"><![CDATA[Federal Government]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/networking.html"><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/government.html"><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/tom+steinert-threlkeld.html"><![CDATA[Tom Steinert-Threlkeld]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">CLWR</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">CMCSA</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">GOOG</category>
		<category domain="tickers">CLWR,CMCSA,GOOG</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[FCC expected to rule against Comcast Aug. 1]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=9448]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[The Federal Communications Commission is expected to announce Aug. 1 that Comcast's network shaping of BitTorrent was wrong.    According to the Wall Street Journal, regulators are expected to rule that Comcast violated policy by hampering BitTorrent sharing. The FCC has been dropping hints for weeks that Comcast...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 18:38:23 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/fcc.html"><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/bittorrent.html"><![CDATA[BitTorrent]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network.html"><![CDATA[Network]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/comcast+corp..html"><![CDATA[Comcast Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network+neutrality.html"><![CDATA[Network Neutrality]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/federal+government.html"><![CDATA[Federal Government]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/networking.html"><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/government.html"><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/larry+dignan.html"><![CDATA[Larry Dignan]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">CMCSA</category>
		<category domain="tickers">CMCSA</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Spam a bigger concern than network neutrality]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10535-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=42361&messageID=781593&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Spam a bigger concern than network neutralityI agree w/the level playing field, and Comcast tilting that...but still unsure as to how spam relates to it all?]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 13:29:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network+neutrality.html"><![CDATA[network neutrality]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network.html"><![CDATA[network]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Network Neutrality and Foreclosing Market Exchange: A Transaction Cost Analysis]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://whitepapers.zdnet.com/abstract.aspx?docid=323896]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[This paper analyzes the effects of "Network neutrality" proposals that seek to mandate an inflexible set of rules that would foreclose or severely limit many market transactions. The model reveals that under plausible conditions, rules that prohibit efficient commercial transactions between content and broadband service providers could, in fact, be...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[White papers]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network.html"><![CDATA[Network]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/broadband.html"><![CDATA[Broadband]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network+neutrality.html"><![CDATA[Network Neutrality]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/analysis.html"><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/broadband+internet.html"><![CDATA[Broadband Internet]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/telecommunications.html"><![CDATA[Telecommunications]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Consumer Protection and Quality of Service (QoS), Including Network Neutrality and Cyber-Security Issues]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://whitepapers.zdnet.com/abstract.aspx?docid=376426]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[The deployment of Next Generation Networks (NGN, using IP connectivity to support fixed, wireless and mobile voice, video, data, and broadcast TV services, provides new opportunities to increasing consumer choice. It also raises new challenges for Quality of Service QoS and for consumer protection. Consumers have certain expectations of the...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[White papers]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/international+telecommunications+union.html"><![CDATA[International Telecommunications Union]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/qos.html"><![CDATA[QoS]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network.html"><![CDATA[Network]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/consumer+protection.html"><![CDATA[Consumer Protection]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network+neutrality.html"><![CDATA[Network Neutrality]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cybersecurity.html"><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[U of Pa. profs and Dave Farber: how can you be that clueless on net neutrality?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/ip-telephony/?p=1139]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[   I'll get to the brilliant (and my sense is he wouldn't mind if you thought so, too) Dave Farber a bit down on this post. But first, some perspective.      At the behest of Gerald Faulhaber, a professor of business and public policy...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 12:57:41 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network.html"><![CDATA[network]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Open source in the political fray]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=637]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[I must admit that the net neutrality debate has begun to surprise me.Those seeking guarantees of network neutrality via Savetheinternet.com are right on the facts, and right on the technology. Cisco already sells boxes that would let Bell or cable ISPs throttle service from any server, or guarantee delivery.At the...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 14:19:35 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network.html"><![CDATA[network]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/neutrality.html"><![CDATA[neutrality]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network+neutrality.html"><![CDATA[network neutrality]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[The Hundt for better business models]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10535-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=19741&messageID=379374&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[The Hundt for better business modelsHell no, he's right.While I don't focus my meager blog on government wrongdoings (I can't even keep up with SemWeb stuff now lol), I have had occasion to run off at the keyboard about our lovely government screwing with us every chance they get. Keep...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 14:18:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/security.html"><![CDATA[SECURITY]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/networking.html"><![CDATA[NETWORKING]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/viruses+and+worms.html"><![CDATA[Viruses and worms]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/medical+system.html"><![CDATA[medical system]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network+neutrality.html"><![CDATA[Network Neutrality]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/satisfactory+service.html"><![CDATA[satisfactory service]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/internet.html"><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/infection.html"><![CDATA[infection]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network.html"><![CDATA[network]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Is the Network Neutrality bill in trouble?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=610]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[After a day at the Freedom2Connect conference outside Washington, I am afraid that Senetor Ron Wyden's Network Neutrality bill may be going nowhere this year.It's not that the legislation has no merit. It has great merit. It's not that the idea of Bell companies violating net neutrality, favoring some content...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 17:49:04 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cable.html"><![CDATA[Cable]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/tvs.html"><![CDATA[TVs]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/tv+%2526+home+theater.html"><![CDATA[TV & Home Theater]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network+neutrality.html"><![CDATA[Network Neutrality]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Network Neutrality: The PR blitz is underway]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-11515-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=18323&messageID=356118&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Network Neutrality: The PR blitz is underwayWhere are the content providers?And other big players from the other side?  Google, Hollywood, et al should be able to counter this.]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 12:57:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network+neutrality.html"><![CDATA[Network Neutrality]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/public+relations.html"><![CDATA[public relations]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network.html"><![CDATA[network]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
