<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[nat device Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/nat+device.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to nat device]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="1" found="1" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Responding to the DNS vulnerability and attacks]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12691-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=50179&messageID=941404&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Responding to the DNS vulnerability and attacksThis is good to know ...[i]Furthermore, if you have a server behind a NAT device, some NAT devices will undo the UDP port randomness introduced by the patch.  Fortunately, Linux iptables and OpenBSD's pf are not vulnerable, but many popular NAT devices are.[/i]I've...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:06:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/networking.html"><![CDATA[NETWORKING]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/linux.html"><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/unix.html"><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/security.html"><![CDATA[SECURITY]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/nat+device.html"><![CDATA[NAT Device]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network+address+translation.html"><![CDATA[Network Address Translation]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/dns.html"><![CDATA[DNS]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
